Tools & Wizards About Us
puresleepreviewer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

puresleepreviewer.com

Top Anti-Snoring Mouthpieces and Mouth Guards Compared in 2018

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

851 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

puresleepreviewer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit puresleepreviewer.com now to see the best up-to-date Puresleepreviewer content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about puresleepreviewer.com

Compare the top anti snoring mouthpieces and mouthguards. There are snoring devices (mouthpieces) that can drastically reduce the snoring in your bedroom.

Visit puresleepreviewer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Puresleepreviewer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 851 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

puresleepreviewer.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

851 ms

js

72 ms

autoptimize_b4f5cd255185e2cb73e2763ccb6e909d.css

96 ms

jquery.js

89 ms

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Puresleepreviewer.com, 19% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (851 ms) relates to the external source Snorenation.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 198.1 kB (83%)

Content Size

240.0 kB

After Optimization

41.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Puresleepreviewer.com main page is 240.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 232.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 197.9 kB

  • Original 232.7 kB
  • After minification 232.5 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Puresleepreviewer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 216 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 216 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (76%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Puresleepreviewer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

851 ms

js

js

72 ms

autoptimize_b4f5cd255185e2cb73e2763ccb6e909d.css

autoptimize_b4f5cd255185e2cb73e2763ccb6e909d.css

96 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

89 ms

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

DMCABadgeHelper.min.js

29 ms

autoptimize_ecd40f09dc5bc3d2e7ab942b7bf80c5b.js

autoptimize_ecd40f09dc5bc3d2e7ab942b7bf80c5b.js

51 ms

css

css

66 ms

css

css

81 ms

css

css

88 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

337 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

336 ms

logo-1-e1478864922187.png

logo-1-e1478864922187.png

357 ms

flat_vSep.png

flat_vSep.png

496 ms

ul1_f_green.png

ul1_f_green.png

494 ms

placeholder.svg

placeholder.svg

493 ms

stars.png

stars.png

590 ms

ul4_f_red.png

ul4_f_red.png

591 ms

ul6_f_blue.png

ul6_f_blue.png

590 ms

toggle_closed.png

toggle_closed.png

589 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

203 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

204 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

297 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

361 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

364 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc0CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc0CsE.ttf

362 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

364 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

364 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

365 ms

load.sumo.com

load.sumo.com

346 ms

lazyload.js

lazyload.js

350 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

141 ms

Accessibility Review

puresleepreviewer.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

puresleepreviewer.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

puresleepreviewer.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Puresleepreviewer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Puresleepreviewer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

puresleepreviewer.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Puresleepreviewer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: