7.8 sec in total
482 ms
6.7 sec
675 ms
Click here to check amazing Purgazsnab content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about purgazsnab.ru
Visit purgazsnab.ruWe analyzed Purgazsnab.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 482 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
purgazsnab.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.164
72/100
15%
Value7.0 s
52/100
10%
482 ms
2684 ms
142 ms
284 ms
418 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Purgazsnab.ru, 23% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Purgazsnab.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 36.1 MB (97%)
37.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Purgazsnab.ru main page is 37.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 36.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 124.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.0 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Purgazsnab needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.0 MB or 98% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Purgazsnab.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (66%)
53
18
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Purgazsnab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
purgazsnab.ru
482 ms
purgazsnab.ru
2684 ms
style.css
142 ms
bootstrap.css
284 ms
hc-offcanvas-nav.min.css
418 ms
style.css
419 ms
line-awesome.min.css
560 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
422 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
434 ms
swiper.min.css
430 ms
post-655.css
556 ms
global.css
557 ms
post-532.css
563 ms
css
40 ms
fontawesome.min.css
574 ms
regular.min.css
577 ms
solid.min.css
694 ms
brands.min.css
695 ms
jquery.min.js
704 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
700 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
760 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
761 ms
heading.css
831 ms
button.css
833 ms
icon-box.css
835 ms
animations.min.css
841 ms
envo.js
920 ms
bootstrap.min.js
919 ms
hc-offcanvas-nav.min.js
972 ms
customscript.js
971 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
975 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
983 ms
waypoints.min.js
1001 ms
core.min.js
1002 ms
frontend.min.js
1113 ms
cropped-13.png
388 ms
negoryuchie-paneli-dlya-vnutrenney-otdelki-foto.jpg
804 ms
dot.png
412 ms
2323-1000x540.jpg
704 ms
179A7534_2-300x300.png
202 ms
179A7535_2-300x300.png
277 ms
179A7559_2-300x300.png
276 ms
PressFoto_316664-XLarge-1.png
1998 ms
PressFoto_316664-XLarge.png
2198 ms
Leroy-Merlin-logo-Italy-300x180.jpg
530 ms
petrovich_logo-300x275.jpg
539 ms
maksidom.png
669 ms
cropped-13-300x51.png
679 ms
Castorama-Emblem-300x169.png
808 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw9aX8.ttf
22 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw9aX8.ttf
27 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw9aX8.ttf
30 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aX8.ttf
35 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw9aX8.ttf
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w9aX8.ttf
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w9aX8.ttf
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w9aX8.ttf
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w9aX8.ttf
37 ms
embed
331 ms
179A7533_4.png
2637 ms
179A7534_2-300x300.png
788 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
740 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1022 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXx0ow.ttf
14 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXx0ow.ttf
15 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXx0ow.ttf
15 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXx0ow.ttf
13 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXx0ow.ttf
5 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXx0ow.ttf
14 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXx0ow.ttf
16 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXx0ow.ttf
16 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXx0ow.ttf
14 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
878 ms
179A7559_2-300x300.png
859 ms
179A7535_2-300x300.png
957 ms
js
73 ms
search.js
5 ms
geometry.js
8 ms
main.js
14 ms
purgazsnab.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
purgazsnab.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
purgazsnab.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Purgazsnab.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Purgazsnab.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
purgazsnab.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Purgazsnab. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: