Tools & Wizards About Us
purview.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

purview.io

Purview: The best way to manage multi-unit operations. Automatically.

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

547 ms

Page Rendered

659 ms

purview.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to purview.io homepage info - get ready to check Purview best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about purview.io

Customized apps built for human-centric operations.

Visit purview.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Purview.io page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

purview.io performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.6

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

purview.io

37 ms

purview.io

104 ms

font-awesome.min.css

39 ms

all.js

18 ms

allpages-a5f8ec004c10c27dba62.js

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Purview.io, 4% (1 request) were made to Widget.cloudinary.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (302 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.segment.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 299.0 kB (81%)

Content Size

370.8 kB

After Optimization

71.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Purview.io main page is 370.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 350.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 294.2 kB

  • Original 350.0 kB
  • After minification 350.0 kB
  • After compression 55.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 294.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 20.0 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Purview needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 53 B

  • Original 824 B
  • After minification 823 B
  • After compression 771 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Purview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

purview.io

purview.io

37 ms

purview.io

purview.io

104 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

39 ms

all.js

all.js

18 ms

allpages-a5f8ec004c10c27dba62.js

allpages-a5f8ec004c10c27dba62.js

76 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

27 ms

landing2-a5f8ec004c10c27dba62.js

landing2-a5f8ec004c10c27dba62.js

58 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

105 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

302 ms

feature-icon-1.png

feature-icon-1.png

157 ms

feature-icon-2.png

feature-icon-2.png

39 ms

feature-icon-3.png

feature-icon-3.png

44 ms

feature-icon-4.png

feature-icon-4.png

41 ms

logo.png

logo.png

68 ms

LatoLatin-Bold.woff2

LatoLatin-Bold.woff2

52 ms

LatoLatin-Heavy.woff2

LatoLatin-Heavy.woff2

51 ms

LatoLatin-Black.woff2

LatoLatin-Black.woff2

50 ms

LatoLatin-Semibold.woff2

LatoLatin-Semibold.woff2

56 ms

LatoLatin-Medium.woff2

LatoLatin-Medium.woff2

31 ms

LatoLatin-Regular.woff2

LatoLatin-Regular.woff2

58 ms

LatoLatin-Light.woff2

LatoLatin-Light.woff2

64 ms

LatoLatin-Thin.woff2

LatoLatin-Thin.woff2

86 ms

LatoLatin-Hairline.woff2

LatoLatin-Hairline.woff2

90 ms

Accessibility Review

purview.io accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

purview.io best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

purview.io SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Purview.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Purview.io main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

purview.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Purview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: