3.1 sec in total
210 ms
2 sec
909 ms
Welcome to pwog.in homepage info - get ready to check PWOG best content right away, or after learning these important things about pwog.in
Finixpa || Industrial & Factorial Business HTML5 Template
Visit pwog.inWe analyzed Pwog.in page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pwog.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value36.1 s
0/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.376
28/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
210 ms
566 ms
36 ms
135 ms
213 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Pwog.in, 16% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (910 ms) belongs to the original domain Pwog.in.
Page size can be reduced by 119.2 kB (1%)
9.7 MB
9.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Pwog.in main page is 9.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.8 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PWOG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pwog.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (55%)
40
18
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PWOG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pwog.in
210 ms
www.pwog.in
566 ms
css
36 ms
bootstrap.min.css
135 ms
magnific-popup.css
213 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
193 ms
animate.css
196 ms
main.css
258 ms
style.css
212 ms
meanmenu.min.css
200 ms
icofont.min.css
327 ms
responsive.css
263 ms
sankbar.css
267 ms
jquery-2.2.4.min.js
461 ms
bootstrap.min.js
460 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
459 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
459 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
459 ms
owl.animate.js
485 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
485 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
487 ms
modernizr.min.js
486 ms
waypoints.min.js
578 ms
jquery.meanmenu.min.js
578 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
602 ms
custom.js
600 ms
logo.png
657 ms
0b504802157d1e09fd7260f204b0bce9.jpg
657 ms
0ec397a6d424806c3c5436be329c5ce2.jpg
658 ms
6a41a14abafe1623117b52ad77bbfb09.jpg
658 ms
d6bcd34b9584302a27d92265a0a0b2f1.jpg
658 ms
38d0a81a6889cea7583f9a2924a10f4c.jpg
660 ms
blog-details.jpg
910 ms
ft-logo.png
659 ms
ccbe7afc847a9e9be4a1a1a65a4fd299.jpg
760 ms
a9b8467ff8cd5e2a73dbaba008edd0c9.jpg
658 ms
39e5e9abd93fca29cba43e55894c2d76.jpg
861 ms
6961d2e0399affd1915d2bd8a04dec2e.png
554 ms
slide2.jpg
515 ms
call_to_action_bg.jpg
585 ms
why-us-bg.jpg
810 ms
footer-bg.jpg
704 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedHFHGPc.woff
88 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedHFHGPezSQ.woff
96 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
119 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
126 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
127 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
126 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
127 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlE92JQEl8qw.woff
126 ms
icofont.woff
418 ms
pwog.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
pwog.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pwog.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pwog.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pwog.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pwog.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PWOG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: