Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 70

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    29% of websites

staging.pipingrock.com

Discount Vitamins, Supplements & Natural Health Products | PipingRock Health Products

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

845 ms

Page Rendered

241 ms

staging.pipingrock.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to staging.pipingrock.com homepage info - get ready to check Staging Piping Rock best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about staging.pipingrock.com

PipingRock brings you the highest quality vitamins and supplements at the lowest cost to you! We offer the biggest selection of life-enhancing natural products in the world.

Visit staging.pipingrock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Staging.pipingrock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

staging.pipingrock.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,480 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

staging.pipingrock.com

11 ms

www.pipingrock.com

118 ms

14622440212.js

81 ms

site.css

147 ms

responsive-site.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Staging.pipingrock.com, 72% (31 requests) were made to Cdn2.pipingrock.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (400 ms) relates to the external source Cdn2.pipingrock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 336.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Staging.pipingrock.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 836.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 149.6 kB

  • Original 229.3 kB
  • After minification 201.6 kB
  • After compression 79.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 836.0 kB
  • After minification 832.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Staging Piping Rock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 156.9 kB

  • Original 343.8 kB
  • After minification 343.8 kB
  • After compression 186.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.9 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 26.0 kB

  • Original 107.1 kB
  • After minification 107.1 kB
  • After compression 81.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staging.pipingrock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (28%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staging Piping Rock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

staging.pipingrock.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

staging.pipingrock.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

staging.pipingrock.com SEO score

70

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staging.pipingrock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staging.pipingrock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Staging Piping Rock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: