Tools & Wizards About Us
staging.projects.fm screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

staging.projects.fm

New Spark Home

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

20 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

714 ms

staging.projects.fm screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Staging Projects content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about staging.projects.fm

Discover how New Spark revolutionizes your media workflows with its secure, modular approach – simplifying complexity like never before.

Visit staging.projects.fm

Key Findings

We analyzed Staging.projects.fm page load time and found that the first response time was 20 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

staging.projects.fm performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,190 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.492

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

staging.projects.fm

20 ms

www.newspark.ca

126 ms

js

318 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

36 ms

www.newspark.ca

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Staging.projects.fm, 62% (32 requests) were made to Newspark.ca and 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (541 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 411.6 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Staging.projects.fm main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 99.0 kB

  • Original 121.0 kB
  • After minification 117.4 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 312.4 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Staging Projects needs image optimization as it can save up to 312.4 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 155 B

  • Original 88.5 kB
  • After minification 88.5 kB
  • After compression 88.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (53%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staging Projects. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

staging.projects.fm

staging.projects.fm

20 ms

www.newspark.ca

www.newspark.ca

126 ms

js

js

318 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

36 ms

www.newspark.ca

www.newspark.ca

39 ms

www.newspark.ca

www.newspark.ca

60 ms

www.newspark.ca

www.newspark.ca

90 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

87 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

89 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

170 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

165 ms

7f806c782e453168284481d54cefed6e.js

7f806c782e453168284481d54cefed6e.js

164 ms

www.newspark.ca

www.newspark.ca

144 ms

companion.bundle.min.js

companion.bundle.min.js

259 ms

6fd5a738bb64f8cfe055efb08068b951.js

6fd5a738bb64f8cfe055efb08068b951.js

259 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

255 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

257 ms

theme.bundle.min.js

theme.bundle.min.js

259 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

258 ms

css

css

65 ms

css

css

86 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

218 ms

bg-whole-page-1.jpg

bg-whole-page-1.jpg

174 ms

julian-o-hayon-143085.jpg

julian-o-hayon-143085.jpg

291 ms

HP-1.png

HP-1.png

156 ms

hearst.png

hearst.png

156 ms

logo.png

logo.png

158 ms

npf.png

npf.png

158 ms

archant.png

archant.png

159 ms

iceroll.png

iceroll.png

160 ms

cangeo.png

cangeo.png

172 ms

wilfrid-laurier-university-1.png

wilfrid-laurier-university-1.png

171 ms

ACTIVENetwork.png

ACTIVENetwork.png

195 ms

design.png

design.png

196 ms

trademark.png

trademark.png

195 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

365 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

458 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

457 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

458 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk50e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk50e0.ttf

498 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk50e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk50e0.ttf

498 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k50e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k50e0.ttf

481 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k50e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k50e0.ttf

541 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k50e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k50e0.ttf

523 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

344 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

396 ms

collect

collect

382 ms

tracker.php

tracker.php

419 ms

lftracker_v1_p1e024BPpg68GB6d.js

lftracker_v1_p1e024BPpg68GB6d.js

393 ms

newsparksmallwhitetext.png

newsparksmallwhitetext.png

97 ms

NS_screens-1.png

NS_screens-1.png

198 ms

collect

collect

70 ms

Accessibility Review

staging.projects.fm accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

staging.projects.fm best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

staging.projects.fm SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staging.projects.fm can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staging.projects.fm main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

staging.projects.fm

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Staging Projects. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: