Tools & Wizards About Us
support.postmarkapp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

support.postmarkapp.com

Postmark Support Center - Resources for sending email with ease

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

830 ms

Page Rendered

793 ms

support.postmarkapp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit support.postmarkapp.com now to see the best up-to-date Support Postmark App content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about support.postmarkapp.com

Postmark support with documentation organized by functionality as well as handy resources for improving your email delivery.

Visit support.postmarkapp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Support.postmarkapp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

support.postmarkapp.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,400 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

support.postmarkapp.com

27 ms

support.postmarkapp.com

53 ms

397 ms

core.9b43533111db825b59b9.css

21 ms

postmark.5236eb677151f47847ee.css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Support.postmarkapp.com, 47% (25 requests) were made to Craft-assets.postmarkapp.com and 30% (16 requests) were made to Postmarkapp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (397 ms) relates to the external source Postmarkapp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

904.8 kB

After Optimization

786.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Support.postmarkapp.com main page is 904.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 440.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 56.1 kB

  • Original 64.8 kB
  • After minification 54.0 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 62.2 kB

  • Original 440.7 kB
  • After minification 378.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Support Postmark App needs image optimization as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 347.8 kB
  • After minification 347.8 kB
  • After compression 347.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 118 B

  • Original 51.5 kB
  • After minification 51.5 kB
  • After compression 51.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Support.postmarkapp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (10%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Support Postmark App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

support.postmarkapp.com

support.postmarkapp.com

27 ms

support.postmarkapp.com

support.postmarkapp.com

53 ms

397 ms

core.9b43533111db825b59b9.css

core.9b43533111db825b59b9.css

21 ms

postmark.5236eb677151f47847ee.css

postmark.5236eb677151f47847ee.css

61 ms

guides@2x.png

guides@2x.png

151 ms

smtp@2x.png

smtp@2x.png

153 ms

inbound@2x.png

inbound@2x.png

128 ms

speed@2x.png

speed@2x.png

148 ms

status-page@2x.png

status-page@2x.png

201 ms

dmarc-tool-icon@2x.png

dmarc-tool-icon@2x.png

123 ms

best-practices-icon-2.png

best-practices-icon-2.png

202 ms

logo-stamp-simple.svg

logo-stamp-simple.svg

43 ms

6iotgzh7gu.jsonp

6iotgzh7gu.jsonp

40 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

99 ms

njmurmik0b

njmurmik0b

47 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

98 ms

1khcrsb1qg.jsonp

1khcrsb1qg.jsonp

43 ms

3pjp2jg8vn

3pjp2jg8vn

94 ms

landing.62373c57e4385a5bc6b5.js

landing.62373c57e4385a5bc6b5.js

96 ms

ac-icon.png

ac-icon.png

193 ms

guides-icon-small@2x.png

guides-icon-small@2x.png

207 ms

api@2x.png

api@2x.png

208 ms

switch-icon-small@2x.png

switch-icon-small@2x.png

164 ms

rebound-icon-small@2x.png

rebound-icon-small@2x.png

193 ms

abdullah.jpg

abdullah.jpg

278 ms

Screenshot-2021-07-26-at-08.46.44.png

Screenshot-2021-07-26-at-08.46.44.png

278 ms

anna_crop.jpg

anna_crop.jpg

278 ms

Wildbit0019.jpg

Wildbit0019.jpg

278 ms

Headshot.jpg

Headshot.jpg

279 ms

T02JENB1D-U06SB2VCMHR-6f6fbf0d2aab-512.jpeg

T02JENB1D-U06SB2VCMHR-6f6fbf0d2aab-512.jpeg

278 ms

MeSquare.png

MeSquare.png

314 ms

nataliekeshlear.jpg

nataliekeshlear.jpg

329 ms

biopic.jpeg

biopic.jpeg

327 ms

IMG_5009.jpg

IMG_5009.jpg

279 ms

dmarc-logo@2x.png

dmarc-logo@2x.png

348 ms

mailmason-logo.png

mailmason-logo.png

290 ms

spamcheck-logo@2x.png

spamcheck-logo@2x.png

347 ms

swatch

swatch

35 ms

swatch

swatch

52 ms

18b5824e08aa212f5f51.svg

18b5824e08aa212f5f51.svg

19 ms

c21fdb52bc0ff4ac96d4.svg

c21fdb52bc0ff4ac96d4.svg

22 ms

ac47c5db44b1d27f9692.svg

ac47c5db44b1d27f9692.svg

24 ms

d92796396990392b367e.svg

d92796396990392b367e.svg

20 ms

7cab672d211e084da98c.svg

7cab672d211e084da98c.svg

32 ms

da9c65f641275acd80be.svg

da9c65f641275acd80be.svg

33 ms

c3e322be9f2580616d1c.svg

c3e322be9f2580616d1c.svg

31 ms

74e72bc7e145a4471db6.svg

74e72bc7e145a4471db6.svg

32 ms

632271f48e1e9bf96655.png

632271f48e1e9bf96655.png

43 ms

swatch

swatch

13 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

70 ms

797248ab1387cc3dd180.woff

797248ab1387cc3dd180.woff

26 ms

9e70168b5c07a8e94c6a.woff

9e70168b5c07a8e94c6a.woff

48 ms

Accessibility Review

support.postmarkapp.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

support.postmarkapp.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

support.postmarkapp.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Support.postmarkapp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Support.postmarkapp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

support.postmarkapp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Support Postmark App. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: