Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com

PIE Recruitment - PIE Recruitment – We do things differently

Page Load Speed

21.4 sec in total

First Response

178 ms

Resources Loaded

20.9 sec

Page Rendered

337 ms

whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Whatwethink PIE Recruitment content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com

PIE Recruitment – We do things differently by cutting out all the funny business, instead providing a customer experience that is second to none. With specialist delivery across the Sales & Marketing...

Visit whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 21.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com

178 ms

whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com

530 ms

js

89 ms

gtm.js

140 ms

CustomTemplatePageCSS

588 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com, 30% (14 requests) were made to Passle-net.s3.amazonaws.com and 17% (8 requests) were made to Images.passle.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) relates to the external source Pls.webtype.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 723.8 kB (28%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 37.2 kB

  • Original 44.0 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 683.9 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whatwethink PIE Recruitment needs image optimization as it can save up to 683.9 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 57.5 kB
  • After minification 57.5 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (25%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whatwethink PIE Recruitment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whatwethink.pie-recruitment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whatwethink PIE Recruitment. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: