Tools & Wizards About Us
pilot.questionpro.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 66

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

pilot.questionpro.com

pilot | QuestionPro Survey

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

492 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

418 ms

pilot.questionpro.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pilot Question Pro content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pilot.questionpro.com

Visit pilot.questionpro.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pilot.questionpro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 492 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pilot.questionpro.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pilot.questionpro.com

492 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

800 ms

global.js

872 ms

bootstrap.modal.only.min.js

256 ms

swfobject-2.1.js

268 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Pilot.questionpro.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.aspnetcdn.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Ajax.aspnetcdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 624.8 kB (73%)

Content Size

854.5 kB

After Optimization

229.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pilot.questionpro.com main page is 854.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 476.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 37.2 kB

  • Original 44.1 kB
  • After minification 37.7 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 13.6 kB
  • After minification 7.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pilot Question Pro needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 316.6 kB

  • Original 476.5 kB
  • After minification 356.5 kB
  • After compression 159.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 316.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 265.3 kB

  • Original 320.4 kB
  • After minification 307.1 kB
  • After compression 55.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pilot.questionpro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 265.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (65%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pilot Question Pro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pilot.questionpro.com

pilot.questionpro.com

492 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

800 ms

global.js

global.js

872 ms

bootstrap.modal.only.min.js

bootstrap.modal.only.min.js

256 ms

swfobject-2.1.js

swfobject-2.1.js

268 ms

flowplayer-3.2.11.min.js

flowplayer-3.2.11.min.js

291 ms

spin.js

spin.js

308 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

869 ms

bootstrap.modal.only.css

bootstrap.modal.only.css

307 ms

porterpopup.css

porterpopup.css

560 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

1600 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

593 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.css

589 ms

searchBox.css

searchBox.css

1179 ms

phototagger.jquery.js

phototagger.jquery.js

992 ms

phototagger.jquery.hs.js

phototagger.jquery.hs.js

989 ms

newgray.css

newgray.css

989 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

243 ms

header-gray-bg.png

header-gray-bg.png

176 ms

free-signup-button.png

free-signup-button.png

175 ms

greenProgressbar.gif

greenProgressbar.gif

268 ms

qp-small-logo.png

qp-small-logo.png

263 ms

waiting.gif

waiting.gif

279 ms

close-icon.png

close-icon.png

280 ms

Accessibility Review

pilot.questionpro.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pilot.questionpro.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

pilot.questionpro.com SEO score

66

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pilot.questionpro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pilot.questionpro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pilot.questionpro.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pilot Question Pro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: