Tools & Wizards About Us
q-interline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

q-interline.com

Q-Interline: Innovative product & process control

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

391 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

q-interline.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Q Interline content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about q-interline.com

We develop analytical solutions for process and product quality for the dairy, feed, food, and agricultural industry worldwide. Read more

Visit q-interline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Q-interline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 391 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

q-interline.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,270 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

q-interline.com

391 ms

q-interline.com

804 ms

uc.js

27 ms

main.min.css

286 ms

style.min.css

293 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Q-interline.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (806 ms) belongs to the original domain Q-interline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 206.8 kB (24%)

Content Size

855.8 kB

After Optimization

648.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Q-interline.com main page is 855.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 341.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 175.8 kB

  • Original 209.2 kB
  • After minification 205.6 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 175.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 269.2 kB
  • After minification 254.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Q Interline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 341.7 kB
  • After minification 341.7 kB
  • After compression 326.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 638 B

  • Original 35.7 kB
  • After minification 35.7 kB
  • After compression 35.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Q-interline.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (51%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Q Interline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

q-interline.com

q-interline.com

391 ms

q-interline.com

q-interline.com

804 ms

uc.js

uc.js

27 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

286 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

293 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

282 ms

styles.css

styles.css

281 ms

contact-form-7-main.min.css

contact-form-7-main.min.css

281 ms

spectra-block-positioning.min.css

spectra-block-positioning.min.css

290 ms

uag-css-31.css

uag-css-31.css

388 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

399 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

373 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

292 ms

modal.js

modal.js

304 ms

index.js

index.js

305 ms

index.js

index.js

437 ms

spectra-block-positioning.min.js

spectra-block-positioning.min.js

437 ms

uagb-button-child.min.js

uagb-button-child.min.js

438 ms

modal.min.js

modal.min.js

438 ms

uag-js-31.js

uag-js-31.js

438 ms

api.js

api.js

57 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

439 ms

index.js

index.js

517 ms

Q-Interline_logo_RGB_Screens_medium-200x34.png

Q-Interline_logo_RGB_Screens_medium-200x34.png

184 ms

Q-only-logo.png

Q-only-logo.png

184 ms

Dairy_icon.webp

Dairy_icon.webp

185 ms

Agri_icon.webp

Agri_icon.webp

184 ms

Feed_icon-1.webp

Feed_icon-1.webp

209 ms

Food_icon.webp

Food_icon.webp

250 ms

more_icon.webp

more_icon.webp

249 ms

Produkt_quant.webp

Produkt_quant.webp

272 ms

Produkt_ISP.webp

Produkt_ISP.webp

263 ms

OneQuantToRuleThemAll_1800x600px-1-edited.webp

OneQuantToRuleThemAll_1800x600px-1-edited.webp

377 ms

InSightPro-1024x741.webp

InSightPro-1024x741.webp

301 ms

John-Crispin-portrait2-1024x1024.jpg

John-Crispin-portrait2-1024x1024.jpg

608 ms

Per_web-edited-scaled-1-1024x1024.webp

Per_web-edited-scaled-1-1024x1024.webp

457 ms

Louise-1024x1024.webp

Louise-1024x1024.webp

453 ms

QI-handskahe@3x.webp

QI-handskahe@3x.webp

490 ms

Quant_GO_build_C-D--1024x733.webp

Quant_GO_build_C-D--1024x733.webp

412 ms

share-1024x796.webp

share-1024x796.webp

500 ms

stilistisk-control-chart-1024x272.webp

stilistisk-control-chart-1024x272.webp

519 ms

Frankrig-4566-1024x683.webp

Frankrig-4566-1024x683.webp

608 ms

d15a41a7-4273-4898-8978-31514162a7a8.js

d15a41a7-4273-4898-8978-31514162a7a8.js

548 ms

Two-women_production-flow_large1.jpg

Two-women_production-flow_large1.jpg

806 ms

rounded.svg

rounded.svg

569 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

27 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

32 ms

ppms.js

ppms.js

453 ms

js

js

69 ms

Accessibility Review

q-interline.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

q-interline.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

q-interline.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Q-interline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Q-interline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

q-interline.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Q Interline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: