Tools & Wizards About Us
qbible.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

qbible.com

qBible.com - A Website for Biblical Research

Page Load Speed

21.2 sec in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

20.1 sec

Page Rendered

958 ms

qbible.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to qbible.com homepage info - get ready to check QBible best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about qbible.com

Read parallel Bibles online: translated with Strong's concordance & Hebrew-Greek versions. Compare translations, study bible, search cross reference verses & post comments in public commentaries at qB...

Visit qbible.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qbible.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 21.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

qbible.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qbible.com

122 ms

main.css

104 ms

menu.css

138 ms

qtip.js

163 ms

menu.js

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Qbible.com, 85% (46 requests) were made to Chatbible.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Firstgospel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

398.6 kB

After Optimization

288.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qbible.com main page is 398.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 314.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 44.5 kB
  • After minification 43.9 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 39.2 kB

  • Original 314.9 kB
  • After minification 311.7 kB
  • After compression 275.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 39.2 kB
  • After minification 27.6 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qbible.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (63%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of QBible. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qbible.com

qbible.com

122 ms

main.css

main.css

104 ms

menu.css

menu.css

138 ms

qtip.js

qtip.js

163 ms

menu.js

menu.js

169 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

66 ms

01-gen-001-001.asp

01-gen-001-001.asp

98 ms

ads-horizontal.asp

ads-horizontal.asp

19811 ms

ads-box.asp

ads-box.asp

19810 ms

comment.asp

comment.asp

74 ms

search-results.asp

search-results.asp

71 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

151 ms

qbible0.gif

qbible0.gif

45 ms

border1.gif

border1.gif

49 ms

qbible1.gif

qbible1.gif

51 ms

qbible5.gif

qbible5.gif

80 ms

search-button.gif

search-button.gif

84 ms

bullet.gif

bullet.gif

77 ms

border2.gif

border2.gif

83 ms

qbible2.gif

qbible2.gif

81 ms

qbible3.gif

qbible3.gif

84 ms

button1.gif

button1.gif

152 ms

qbible4.gif

qbible4.gif

153 ms

border3.gif

border3.gif

152 ms

button2.gif

button2.gif

153 ms

border4.gif

border4.gif

154 ms

tl-qbible1.gif

tl-qbible1.gif

153 ms

tl-qbible2.gif

tl-qbible2.gif

154 ms

t.gif

t.gif

160 ms

tr.gif

tr.gif

155 ms

l.gif

l.gif

154 ms

new.gif

new.gif

158 ms

check.gif

check.gif

158 ms

r.gif

r.gif

177 ms

bl-1.gif

bl-1.gif

181 ms

bl-2.gif

bl-2.gif

181 ms

b.gif

b.gif

187 ms

br.gif

br.gif

187 ms

key.gif

key.gif

186 ms

fb2.gif

fb2.gif

223 ms

button1a.gif

button1a.gif

224 ms

button2a.gif

button2a.gif

231 ms

fbs.gif

fbs.gif

215 ms

000.js

000.js

219 ms

search0.gif

search0.gif

316 ms

banner-top.gif

banner-top.gif

258 ms

banner.gif

banner.gif

245 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

247 ms

038.js

038.js

65 ms

163.js

163.js

45 ms

079.js

079.js

38 ms

comments-head.gif

comments-head.gif

77 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

44 ms

ads

ads

335 ms

Accessibility Review

qbible.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

qbible.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

qbible.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qbible.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qbible.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

qbible.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of QBible. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: