Tools & Wizards About Us
qbyte.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

qbyte.in

Website Design Company in Pune | Web Development Services in Pune | Web Design Company | web development company in pune | SEO SMO | Digital Marketing...

Page Load Speed

24.9 sec in total

First Response

605 ms

Resources Loaded

23.9 sec

Page Rendered

434 ms

qbyte.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Qbyte content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qbyte.in

Qbyte Solution is India's leading SEO Marketing,web design company, web development & web solutions company, website design & development company in pune. Being a top digital marketing & seo company i...

Visit qbyte.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Qbyte.in page load time and found that the first response time was 605 ms and then it took 24.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

qbyte.in performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qbyte.in

605 ms

www.qbyte.in

1840 ms

bootstrap.min.css

2369 ms

normalize.css

586 ms

style.css

1186 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Qbyte.in, 5% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Qbyte.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 947.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qbyte.in main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 35.8 kB

  • Original 41.0 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.3 kB, which is 45% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 556.1 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qbyte needs image optimization as it can save up to 556.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 147.0 kB

  • Original 203.8 kB
  • After minification 179.2 kB
  • After compression 56.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 208.3 kB

  • Original 250.6 kB
  • After minification 231.4 kB
  • After compression 42.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qbyte.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 208.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (41%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qbyte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qbyte.in

qbyte.in

605 ms

www.qbyte.in

www.qbyte.in

1840 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

2369 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

586 ms

style.css

style.css

1186 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

998 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

1420 ms

aos.css

aos.css

39 ms

css2

css2

43 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

780 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

798 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

974 ms

qbytelogo-1.png

qbytelogo-1.png

999 ms

web-dev-aboutus-img.gif

web-dev-aboutus-img.gif

10055 ms

digital-marketing.png

digital-marketing.png

3799 ms

web-development.png

web-development.png

3593 ms

social-media-marketing.png

social-media-marketing.png

3243 ms

graphics-design.png

graphics-design.png

3083 ms

g-suit.png

g-suit.png

3751 ms

equtek%20system.png

equtek%20system.png

5694 ms

grip%20mechatronics.png

grip%20mechatronics.png

11531 ms

ARG%20supply%20tech.png

ARG%20supply%20tech.png

18061 ms

PTI.png

PTI.png

19618 ms

macsys%20controls.png

macsys%20controls.png

12519 ms

earthnetic.png

earthnetic.png

7339 ms

AP%20communications.png

AP%20communications.png

8268 ms

Arihant%20electricals.png

Arihant%20electricals.png

9091 ms

Chh.%20shivaji%20polytechnic%20vaduj.png

Chh.%20shivaji%20polytechnic%20vaduj.png

9984 ms

Gurukrupa%20infotech.png

Gurukrupa%20infotech.png

10629 ms

KVM%20wai.png

KVM%20wai.png

10943 ms

Ra-Teck%20control%20system.png

Ra-Teck%20control%20system.png

11175 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

11463 ms

script.js

script.js

11174 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

11684 ms

jquery.transit.min.js

jquery.transit.min.js

11769 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

11914 ms

aos.js

aos.js

19 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

12115 ms

custom.js

custom.js

11967 ms

Website-development-banner1.jpg

Website-development-banner1.jpg

11125 ms

social-media-marketing-banner.jpg

social-media-marketing-banner.jpg

13542 ms

graphics-design-banner.jpg

graphics-design-banner.jpg

11387 ms

web-devlopment-banner-img.jpg

web-devlopment-banner-img.jpg

19634 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

11568 ms

Accessibility Review

qbyte.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

qbyte.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

qbyte.in SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qbyte.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qbyte.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qbyte.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qbyte. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: