Tools & Wizards About Us
qbyte.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 42

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

qbyte.in

Website Design Company in Pune | Web Development Services in Pune | Web Design Company | web development company in pune | SEO SMO | Digital Marketing...

Page Load Speed

8.7 sec in total

First Response

636 ms

Resources Loaded

7.9 sec

Page Rendered

200 ms

qbyte.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Qbyte content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qbyte.in

Qbyte Solution is India's leading SEO Marketing,web design company, web development & web solutions company, website design & development company in pune. Being a top digital marketing & seo company i...

Visit qbyte.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Qbyte.in page load time and found that the first response time was 636 ms and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qbyte.in performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.7 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.6 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qbyte.in

636 ms

www.qbyte.in

1512 ms

StyleSheet.css

1631 ms

banner.css

1860 ms

bannerStyle.css

628 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Qbyte.in, 2% (2 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to S.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Qbyte.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (69%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

861.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qbyte.in main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 58.5 kB

  • Original 69.1 kB
  • After minification 49.1 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.0 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 591.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qbyte needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 65% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 593.2 kB

  • Original 820.3 kB
  • After minification 654.9 kB
  • After compression 227.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 593.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 185.1 kB

  • Original 216.8 kB
  • After minification 185.9 kB
  • After compression 31.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qbyte.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (30%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

54

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qbyte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qbyte.in

qbyte.in

636 ms

www.qbyte.in

www.qbyte.in

1512 ms

StyleSheet.css

StyleSheet.css

1631 ms

banner.css

banner.css

1860 ms

bannerStyle.css

bannerStyle.css

628 ms

menu.css

menu.css

1677 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

838 ms

banner.js

banner.js

1350 ms

banner2.js

banner2.js

1172 ms

banner3.js

banner3.js

1047 ms

banner4.js

banner4.js

1257 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

10 ms

loader.js

loader.js

7 ms

top.js

top.js

1820 ms

test.css

test.css

1466 ms

testmonial1.js

testmonial1.js

1780 ms

testJScript.js

testJScript.js

1681 ms

scrollbox1.js

scrollbox1.js

1832 ms

tabmenu.js

tabmenu.js

1895 ms

packed.js

packed.js

1896 ms

loader.js

loader.js

22 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

20 ms

clock.js

clock.js

1789 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

2091 ms

jssor.core.js

jssor.core.js

1829 ms

jssor.utils.js

jssor.utils.js

3363 ms

jssor.slider.js

jssor.slider.js

4825 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

218 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

329 ms

fb.png

fb.png

359 ms

gplus.png

gplus.png

438 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

543 ms

feed.png

feed.png

561 ms

find-out-more-bt.png

find-out-more-bt.png

634 ms

s3.png

s3.png

1315 ms

s3t.jpg

s3t.jpg

756 ms

s4.png

s4.png

4096 ms

s4t.jpg

s4t.jpg

850 ms

s5.png

s5.png

1399 ms

s5t.jpg

s5t.jpg

1070 ms

s6.png

s6.png

1771 ms

s6t.jpg

s6t.jpg

1524 ms

training.png

training.png

1669 ms

Magnetic-v-block.png

Magnetic-v-block.png

1749 ms

shivaji.jpg

shivaji.jpg

1884 ms

apcommunications.jpg

apcommunications.jpg

2514 ms

gurukrupainfoworld.jpg

gurukrupainfoworld.jpg

1959 ms

iokcoe.jpg

iokcoe.jpg

1987 ms

kvmwai.jpg

kvmwai.jpg

2098 ms

manmandirkudal.jpg

manmandirkudal.jpg

2170 ms

pavantours.jpg

pavantours.jpg

2206 ms

weaverstale.jpg

weaverstale.jpg

2313 ms

littlehearts_sg.jpg

littlehearts_sg.jpg

2380 ms

arihant_transormers.jpg

arihant_transormers.jpg

2423 ms

envisionautomation.jpg

envisionautomation.jpg

2528 ms

rateckcs.jpg

rateckcs.jpg

2581 ms

testi_btn_prev.png

testi_btn_prev.png

2628 ms

testi_btn_next.png

testi_btn_next.png

2705 ms

dc.js

dc.js

23 ms

1.png

1.png

2630 ms

2.png

2.png

2650 ms

3.png

3.png

2643 ms

4.png

4.png

2602 ms

5.png

5.png

2604 ms

banner-background.png

banner-background.png

2579 ms

main_bg.jpg

main_bg.jpg

211 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

207 ms

a07.png

a07.png

217 ms

left-bottom-dotted.png

left-bottom-dotted.png

211 ms

web-designing-img.png

web-designing-img.png

216 ms

software-development.png

software-development.png

620 ms

e-commerce_shopping_5095.png

e-commerce_shopping_5095.png

419 ms

api_icon.png

api_icon.png

628 ms

askusme.png

askusme.png

428 ms

input-box.png

input-box.png

431 ms

comment-bg.png

comment-bg.png

628 ms

gallery_bg_img.png

gallery_bg_img.png

643 ms

gallery_bottom_shadow.png

gallery_bottom_shadow.png

647 ms

previse_arrow.png

previse_arrow.png

826 ms

next_arrow.png

next_arrow.png

837 ms

tabbg.gif

tabbg.gif

837 ms

tab-menu-li-left.png

tab-menu-li-left.png

856 ms

icon_left.gif

icon_left.gif

862 ms

icon_right.gif

icon_right.gif

1032 ms

testimonial_bg.png

testimonial_bg.png

1046 ms

footer-background.png

footer-background.png

1045 ms

footer-line.png

footer-line.png

1069 ms

loader.js

loader.js

174 ms

Accessibility Review

qbyte.in accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

qbyte.in best practices score

42

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

qbyte.in SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qbyte.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qbyte.in main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

qbyte.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qbyte. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: