2.1 sec in total
270 ms
1.6 sec
228 ms
Click here to check amazing Qhoster content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qhoster.eu
Buy web hosting, domains and VPS with PayPal, Bitcoin, Payza, Skrill, WebMoney, Perfect Money, SolidTrustPay, Credit Card and more payment methods.
Visit qhoster.euWe analyzed Qhoster.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
qhoster.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.847
4/100
15%
Value5.1 s
75/100
10%
270 ms
228 ms
529 ms
68 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Qhoster.eu, 82% (81 requests) were made to Qhoster.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (529 ms) relates to the external source Qhoster.com.
Page size can be reduced by 47.8 kB (8%)
611.4 kB
563.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Qhoster.eu main page is 611.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 397.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qhoster images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qhoster.eu has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (42%)
92
53
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qhoster. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qhoster.eu
270 ms
www.qhoster.com
228 ms
www.qhoster.com
529 ms
cloudflare.min.js
68 ms
style.css
35 ms
jquery.min.js
65 ms
menu.css
88 ms
dropdown.js
87 ms
modernizr.min.js
85 ms
jquery.slicknav.js
92 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
86 ms
main.js
85 ms
element.js
91 ms
tabs.js
87 ms
css
83 ms
translateelement.css
53 ms
main.js
152 ms
bag2
20 ms
ga.js
116 ms
img.gif
95 ms
livechat-new.js
272 ms
headercon_bg.png
32 ms
logo.jpg
30 ms
helpicon.png
30 ms
top_icon1.png
33 ms
top_icon2.png
30 ms
top_icons.png
28 ms
live_chat.png
57 ms
skype.png
62 ms
phone_icon.png
62 ms
flag1.png
57 ms
flag2.png
56 ms
nav_bg.png
60 ms
promotion_icon.png
117 ms
promotion_btn.png
79 ms
main_bannerbg.jpg
81 ms
banner1_image.jpg
79 ms
banner1_liicons.png
80 ms
banner_bg.png
79 ms
save_tag.png
113 ms
orange_btn.png
114 ms
credit_icon.png
113 ms
banner2_image.jpg
112 ms
banner3_image.jpg
81 ms
banner4_image.jpg
116 ms
banner5_image.jpg
114 ms
tab_activebg.png
122 ms
tab_bg.png
118 ms
plan1_image.jpg
117 ms
plan_icon1.png
117 ms
plan_flag2.png
121 ms
plan_flag1.png
122 ms
bullet.png
117 ms
plan1_btnbg2.png
118 ms
plan2_image.jpg
119 ms
plan_icon2.png
120 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
61 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
73 ms
bag2
131 ms
element_main.js
69 ms
plan_bullet2.png
98 ms
plan3_image.jpg
97 ms
windows_linuxtag.png
96 ms
plan_icon3.png
94 ms
english_flag.png
106 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
usa_flag.png
72 ms
canada_flag.png
71 ms
bulgaria_flag.png
81 ms
lithuania_flag.png
80 ms
france_flag.png
78 ms
germany_flag.png
77 ms
netherlands_flag.png
96 ms
switzerland_flag.png
79 ms
plan_bullet3.png
85 ms
plan4_image.jpg
79 ms
plan_icon4.png
78 ms
plan_bullet4.png
77 ms
translate_24dp.png
95 ms
l
59 ms
cleardot.gif
101 ms
planrt_icon1.png
54 ms
planrt_icon2.png
53 ms
planrt_icon3.png
54 ms
planrt_icon4.png
55 ms
planrt_icon5.png
54 ms
planrt_icon6.png
81 ms
box1_innerimg.png
81 ms
small_bullet.png
79 ms
icons.jpg
78 ms
gurantee_tag.jpg
78 ms
footerbox_bg.png
78 ms
contact_icon.png
89 ms
social_icons.png
87 ms
btm_icon.png
87 ms
trustee_icocn.png
87 ms
js
39 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
17 ms
livechat-cloud-new.js
74 ms
qhoster.eu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
qhoster.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
qhoster.eu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qhoster.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qhoster.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qhoster.eu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qhoster. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: