Tools & Wizards About Us
qimpc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

qimpc.com

Internal Medicine of Greater New Haven: Internists: Cheshire, CT & Guilford, CT

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

44 ms

Resources Loaded

565 ms

Page Rendered

526 ms

qimpc.com screenshot

About Website

Visit qimpc.com now to see the best up-to-date Qimpc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qimpc.com

Trusted Internists serving Cheshire, CT & Guilford, CT. Visit our website to book an appointment online: Internal Medicine of Greater New Haven

Visit qimpc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qimpc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qimpc.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qimpc.com

44 ms

imgreaternewhaven.com

53 ms

www.imgreaternewhaven.com

35 ms

practice.atomic.application.scss

154 ms

practice.application.js

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Qimpc.com, 54% (13 requests) were made to Sa1s3optim.patientpop.com and 21% (5 requests) were made to Sa1s3.patientpop.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (258 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 132.4 kB (44%)

Content Size

300.5 kB

After Optimization

168.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Qimpc.com main page is 300.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 150.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 127.4 kB

  • Original 149.6 kB
  • After minification 128.1 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 150.9 kB
  • After minification 145.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qimpc images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (35%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qimpc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qimpc.com

qimpc.com

44 ms

imgreaternewhaven.com

imgreaternewhaven.com

53 ms

www.imgreaternewhaven.com

www.imgreaternewhaven.com

35 ms

practice.atomic.application.scss

practice.atomic.application.scss

154 ms

practice.application.js

practice.application.js

141 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

258 ms

1735727.jpg

1735727.jpg

197 ms

38059.jpg

38059.jpg

249 ms

1727062.jpg

1727062.jpg

186 ms

43718.png

43718.png

183 ms

43719.png

43719.png

182 ms

43720.png

43720.png

183 ms

43721.png

43721.png

183 ms

43722.png

43722.png

183 ms

43723.png

43723.png

188 ms

43724.png

43724.png

189 ms

44327.png

44327.png

187 ms

44328.png

44328.png

186 ms

44329.png

44329.png

185 ms

44330.png

44330.png

196 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

32 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

32 ms

pp-font-awesome-atomic-subset.woff

pp-font-awesome-atomic-subset.woff

40 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

39 ms

Accessibility Review

qimpc.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

qimpc.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

qimpc.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qimpc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qimpc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qimpc.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qimpc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: