Tools & Wizards About Us
qjmail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

qjmail.com

QJMail.com - Web Directory,and Shopping Directory of Selected Websites

Page Load Speed

523 ms in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

353 ms

Page Rendered

114 ms

qjmail.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing QJMail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qjmail.com

QJMail.Com Site provides Directory of selected websites, shopping resources, news, articles, and related information

Visit qjmail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qjmail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 467 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qjmail.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,410 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qjmail.com

56 ms

qjmail.com

52 ms

boilerplate.css

16 ms

articles.css

32 ms

adsbygoogle.js

88 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Qjmail.com, 15% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (88 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.9 kB (3%)

Content Size

285.4 kB

After Optimization

276.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qjmail.com main page is 285.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 9.0 kB
  • After minification 8.5 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 23.7 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. QJMail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 98 B

  • Original 244.3 kB
  • After minification 244.2 kB
  • After compression 244.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 8.4 kB
  • After minification 8.4 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qjmail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (40%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of QJMail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qjmail.com

qjmail.com

56 ms

qjmail.com

qjmail.com

52 ms

boilerplate.css

boilerplate.css

16 ms

articles.css

articles.css

32 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

88 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

61 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

72 ms

js

js

62 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

36 ms

mainbg.jpg

mainbg.jpg

14 ms

logo.png

logo.png

82 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

79 ms

logo.png

logo.png

11 ms

Accessibility Review

qjmail.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

qjmail.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

qjmail.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qjmail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qjmail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qjmail.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of QJMail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: