Access qlq.com. qlq.com

Report Summary

About Website

Visit qlq.com now to see the best up-to-date Qlq content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qlq.com

We specialize in short liquid domain names.

Visit qlq.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

qlq.com

2511 ms

css.css

264 ms

gxh3vhx.js

195 ms

jquery.viewportchecker.js

1505 ms

jquery.min.js

150 ms

Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Qlq.com, 12% (15 requests) were made to Cdn.datatables.net and 7% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Qlq.com.

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

887.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Qlq.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 106.3 kB

Original 145.6 kB
After minification 143.2 kB
After compression 39.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 86.6 kB

Original 437.5 kB
After minification 350.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qlq needs image optimization as it can save up to 86.6 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 649.4 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.0 MB
After compression 412.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 649.4 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 496.5 kB

Original 581.2 kB
After minification 505.1 kB
After compression 84.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qlq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 496.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

114

After Optimization

The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qlq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

N/A
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qlq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Qlq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qlq.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Qlq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

qlq.com

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)