Tools & Wizards About Us
qos.by screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

qos.by

Qos | QoS type интернет итрафик свойства быстроты интернета

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

481 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

qos.by screenshot

About Website

Welcome to qos.by homepage info - get ready to check Qos best content for Belarus right away, or after learning these important things about qos.by

QoS относится к способности сети предоставлять трафику требуемые услуги в рамках определенных технологических ограничений.

Visit qos.by

Key Findings

We analyzed Qos.by page load time and found that the first response time was 481 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qos.by performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,070 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qos.by

481 ms

qos.by

638 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

138 ms

style.min.css

259 ms

css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Qos.by, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Qos.by.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 276.0 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qos.by main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 95.6 kB

  • Original 119.8 kB
  • After minification 115.9 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 156.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qos needs image optimization as it can save up to 156.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 140.9 kB
  • After minification 140.9 kB
  • After compression 128.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 74.8 kB
  • After minification 74.8 kB
  • After compression 63.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qos.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (58%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qos. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qos.by

qos.by

481 ms

qos.by

qos.by

638 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

138 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

259 ms

css

css

32 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

356 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

361 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

475 ms

post-11.css

post-11.css

363 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

360 ms

css

css

48 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

377 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

474 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

476 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

495 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

496 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

554 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

705 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

591 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

618 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

619 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

620 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

632 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

1278 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

1340 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1317 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

1278 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1342 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1275 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1406 ms

cropped-logo-2-56x56.png

cropped-logo-2-56x56.png

1432 ms

qos.png

qos.png

1524 ms

speedtest-belarus-1024x401.png

speedtest-belarus-1024x401.png

1788 ms

speedtest-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D1%8C-1024x294.png

speedtest-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D1%8C-1024x294.png

1809 ms

qos-pebzj7wohs6mnsiu7m9w75mlty1y8ep3nbd3ph39mw.jpeg

qos-pebzj7wohs6mnsiu7m9w75mlty1y8ep3nbd3ph39mw.jpeg

1460 ms

expressgsm-serwis-telefonow.jpeg

expressgsm-serwis-telefonow.jpeg

1647 ms

remont-telefonov-gomel-1024x1024.png

remont-telefonov-gomel-1024x1024.png

2109 ms

%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%82%D1%83-%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%88%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0.jpeg

%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%82%D1%83-%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%88%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0.jpeg

1695 ms

qos-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D1%8C.jpeg

qos-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D1%8C.jpeg

1766 ms

speedtest-qos.jpeg

speedtest-qos.jpeg

1998 ms

qos-4g.jpeg

qos-4g.jpeg

1802 ms

customer-1-150x150.jpg

customer-1-150x150.jpg

1635 ms

customer-4-150x150.jpg

customer-4-150x150.jpg

1879 ms

customer-3-150x150.jpg

customer-3-150x150.jpg

1666 ms

graphic-1.svg

graphic-1.svg

1680 ms

font

font

26 ms

font

font

34 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1518 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

1618 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

1701 ms

Accessibility Review

qos.by accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

qos.by best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

qos.by SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qos.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qos.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qos.by

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Qos. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: