Tools & Wizards About Us
qpi.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

qpi.in

Website Design, E-commerce Web Development, SEO Services Gurgaon

Page Load Speed

14.5 sec in total

First Response

2.9 sec

Resources Loaded

11.1 sec

Page Rendered

492 ms

qpi.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Qpi content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qpi.in

Trusted Website Designing Company with e-commerce website design, web development & best SEO - digital marketing services company in Gurgaon

Visit qpi.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Qpi.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 11.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qpi.in performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

quarterpie.com

2870 ms

css

30 ms

style.css

391 ms

responsive.css

580 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

581 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Qpi.in, 16% (16 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 586.7 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qpi.in main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 42.9 kB

  • Original 55.0 kB
  • After minification 51.6 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 276.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 939.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qpi needs image optimization as it can save up to 276.9 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 143.3 kB

  • Original 431.1 kB
  • After minification 429.3 kB
  • After compression 287.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.3 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 123.5 kB

  • Original 149.4 kB
  • After minification 140.6 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qpi.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (59%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qpi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

quarterpie.com

quarterpie.com

2870 ms

css

css

30 ms

style.css

style.css

391 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

580 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

581 ms

slick.css

slick.css

587 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

983 ms

upw-theme-standard.min.css

upw-theme-standard.min.css

405 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

plugin.css

plugin.css

426 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

769 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

583 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

779 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

790 ms

jquery.qtip.min.js

jquery.qtip.min.js

832 ms

custom.js

custom.js

777 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

962 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

976 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

84 ms

nux4auv.js

nux4auv.js

77 ms

layout.css

layout.css

777 ms

general.css

general.css

796 ms

typography.css

typography.css

801 ms

nav.css

nav.css

844 ms

form.css

form.css

963 ms

jquery.qtip.css

jquery.qtip.css

980 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

259 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

189 ms

back-head.png

back-head.png

265 ms

back-header.png

back-header.png

270 ms

logo.png

logo.png

269 ms

slide_1.png

slide_1.png

1380 ms

slide_2.png

slide_2.png

842 ms

slide_3.png

slide_3.png

961 ms

icon-html5.png

icon-html5.png

517 ms

icon-quality.png

icon-quality.png

516 ms

icon-design.png

icon-design.png

515 ms

icon-digital-marketing.png

icon-digital-marketing.png

656 ms

icon-consulting.png

icon-consulting.png

656 ms

icon-ecommerce.png

icon-ecommerce.png

671 ms

icon-award.png

icon-award.png

847 ms

top25-web-design-development-company.jpg

top25-web-design-development-company.jpg

855 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

1147 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

1106 ms

timthumb.php

timthumb.php

1101 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

41 ms

divider-top.png

divider-top.png

1048 ms

search.png

search.png

1154 ms

social.png

social.png

1243 ms

pattern12.png

pattern12.png

1299 ms

skelatal_weave.png

skelatal_weave.png

1298 ms

w-map.png

w-map.png

1551 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

1345 ms

more.png

more.png

1435 ms

divider-box2.png

divider-box2.png

1491 ms

all.png

all.png

1490 ms

tag-icon.png

tag-icon.png

1537 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

1560 ms

back-exp.png

back-exp.png

1628 ms

10-years-exp.png

10-years-exp.png

1683 ms

icons.png

icons.png

1684 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

48 ms

css

css

31 ms

list-style.png

list-style.png

1711 ms

divider-box.png

divider-box.png

1735 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

130 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

130 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

125 ms

top.png

top.png

1686 ms

182 ms

2318.js

2318.js

137 ms

d

d

74 ms

d

d

110 ms

d

d

92 ms

d

d

92 ms

d

d

109 ms

d

d

109 ms

d

d

92 ms

d

d

128 ms

d

d

194 ms

d

d

136 ms

d

d

129 ms

d

d

128 ms

d

d

137 ms

d

d

213 ms

d

d

5264 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

143 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

75 ms

icons-shadow.png

icons-shadow.png

1572 ms

77 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

271 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

32 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

16 ms

p.gif

p.gif

62 ms

collect

collect

57 ms

js

js

57 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

8 ms

Accessibility Review

qpi.in accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

qpi.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

qpi.in SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qpi.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qpi.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qpi.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Qpi. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: