Tools & Wizards About Us
qrp.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

qrp.ru

Главная страница

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

qrp.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to qrp.ru homepage info - get ready to check Qrp best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about qrp.ru

RU-QRP Club

Visit qrp.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Qrp.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qrp.ru performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qrp.ru

1024 ms

style.css

383 ms

attachments1.css

263 ms

modstyle.css

254 ms

phocagallery_module_image.css

274 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Qrp.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Rcwc.ru and 1% (1 request) were made to R3p.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Qrp.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 279.1 kB (47%)

Content Size

589.3 kB

After Optimization

310.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qrp.ru main page is 589.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 271.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

  • Original 60.6 kB
  • After minification 58.6 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 271.5 kB
  • After minification 263.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qrp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 179.5 kB

  • Original 204.5 kB
  • After minification 89.3 kB
  • After compression 25.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 41.9 kB

  • Original 52.8 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qrp.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (63%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qrp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qrp.ru

qrp.ru

1024 ms

style.css

style.css

383 ms

attachments1.css

attachments1.css

263 ms

modstyle.css

modstyle.css

254 ms

phocagallery_module_image.css

phocagallery_module_image.css

274 ms

modal.css

modal.css

278 ms

kunenalatest.css

kunenalatest.css

384 ms

mootools-uncompressed.js

mootools-uncompressed.js

779 ms

caption.js

caption.js

390 ms

attachments_refresh.js

attachments_refresh.js

410 ms

phocagalleryslideshow.js

phocagalleryslideshow.js

417 ms

modal.js

modal.js

508 ms

template.css

template.css

509 ms

rating.css

rating.css

516 ms

hwdvs_com_content__frontpage_0_1.css

hwdvs_com_content__frontpage_0_1.css

546 ms

system.css

system.css

556 ms

general.css

general.css

634 ms

template.css

template.css

635 ms

blue.css

blue.css

642 ms

white_bg.css

white_bg.css

687 ms

r3p.gif

r3p.gif

349 ms

1363325460_rcwc.gif

1363325460_rcwc.gif

552 ms

mw_shadow_l.png

mw_shadow_l.png

132 ms

mw_shadow_r.png

mw_shadow_r.png

140 ms

mw_header_t.png

mw_header_t.png

131 ms

mw_header_t_l.png

mw_header_t_l.png

130 ms

mw_header_t_r.png

mw_header_t_r.png

138 ms

ruqrp-logo.png

ruqrp-logo.png

381 ms

mw_header_b.png

mw_header_b.png

256 ms

mw_header_l_b.png

mw_header_l_b.png

256 ms

mw_header_r_b.png

mw_header_r_b.png

260 ms

mw_menu_cap_l.png

mw_menu_cap_l.png

274 ms

mw_menu_normal_bg.png

mw_menu_normal_bg.png

278 ms

mw_menu_separator.png

mw_menu_separator.png

381 ms

mw_menu_cap_r.png

mw_menu_cap_r.png

382 ms

mw_content_t.png

mw_content_t.png

391 ms

mw_content_t_l.png

mw_content_t_l.png

411 ms

mw_content_t_r.png

mw_content_t_r.png

417 ms

mw_box_br.png

mw_box_br.png

505 ms

mw_box_bl.png

mw_box_bl.png

507 ms

mw_box_tr.png

mw_box_tr.png

507 ms

mw_box_tl.png

mw_box_tl.png

519 ms

cq_qrp_81.gif

cq_qrp_81.gif

1090 ms

lab599_banner.jpg

lab599_banner.jpg

694 ms

xiegu_ru_banner.jpg

xiegu_ru_banner.jpg

631 ms

baner88x31.jpg

baner88x31.jpg

631 ms

qrparci.gif

qrparci.gif

633 ms

knr.png

knr.png

650 ms

ru_cw_banner.png

ru_cw_banner.png

757 ms

livemarks.png

livemarks.png

758 ms

mw_line_grey.png

mw_line_grey.png

759 ms

blank.png

blank.png

781 ms

tp-205.jpg

tp-205.jpg

831 ms

tp-204.jpg

tp-204.jpg

884 ms

tp-203.jpg

tp-203.jpg

884 ms

shadow1.gif

shadow1.gif

885 ms

phoca_thumb_m_365.jpg

phoca_thumb_m_365.jpg

910 ms

phoca_thumb_m_0337.jpg

phoca_thumb_m_0337.jpg

939 ms

image.gif

image.gif

230 ms

phoca_thumb_m_sdc11983.jpg

phoca_thumb_m_sdc11983.jpg

887 ms

pdf_button.png

pdf_button.png

887 ms

printButton.png

printButton.png

888 ms

emailButton.png

emailButton.png

911 ms

jc_blog.gif

jc_blog.gif

978 ms

groups_logo_sm.gif

groups_logo_sm.gif

887 ms

slet_2019.jpg

slet_2019.jpg

887 ms

trophy.jpg

trophy.jpg

884 ms

hall_of_fame.jpg

hall_of_fame.jpg

905 ms

museum.jpg

museum.jpg

953 ms

facebook_logo.png

facebook_logo.png

877 ms

vkontakte_logo.png

vkontakte_logo.png

888 ms

beacon.png

beacon.png

888 ms

mw_content_b.png

mw_content_b.png

880 ms

mw_content_b_l.png

mw_content_b_l.png

898 ms

mw_content_b_r.png

mw_content_b_r.png

948 ms

mw_footer_b.png

mw_footer_b.png

889 ms

mw_footer_b_l.png

mw_footer_b_l.png

888 ms

mw_footer_b_r.png

mw_footer_b_r.png

888 ms

1363325460_rcwc.gif

1363325460_rcwc.gif

557 ms

Accessibility Review

qrp.ru accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

qrp.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

qrp.ru SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qrp.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qrp.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qrp.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qrp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: