Tools & Wizards About Us
qstec.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

qstec.com

Home | QSTec - Qatar Solar Technologies

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

465 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

239 ms

qstec.com screenshot

About Website

Visit qstec.com now to see the best up-to-date QSTec content for Qatar and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qstec.com

Visit qstec.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qstec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 465 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qstec.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.12

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qstec.com

465 ms

vert.css

634 ms

artifactCss

177 ms

1.js

642 ms

xhtmltargetselector.js

628 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Qstec.com, 70% (23 requests) were made to Dek9j17piv5dm.cloudfront.net and 12% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (799 ms) relates to the external source Dek9j17piv5dm.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 696.5 kB (57%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

520.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qstec.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 846.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 110.5 kB

  • Original 145.2 kB
  • After minification 141.6 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 208.6 kB
  • After minification 199.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. QSTec images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 562.8 kB

  • Original 846.1 kB
  • After minification 834.9 kB
  • After compression 283.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 562.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 16.7 kB
  • After minification 11.7 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qstec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (56%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of QSTec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qstec.com

qstec.com

465 ms

vert.css

vert.css

634 ms

artifactCss

artifactCss

177 ms

1.js

1.js

642 ms

xhtmltargetselector.js

xhtmltargetselector.js

628 ms

elementsBySelector.js

elementsBySelector.js

627 ms

flymenu.js

flymenu.js

626 ms

71.js

71.js

636 ms

368.js

368.js

791 ms

428.js

428.js

799 ms

429.js

429.js

793 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

11 ms

452

452

301 ms

454

454

299 ms

470

470

401 ms

9

9

130 ms

11

11

132 ms

453

453

289 ms

440

440

277 ms

446

446

364 ms

442

442

278 ms

438

438

277 ms

474

474

376 ms

448

448

278 ms

ga.js

ga.js

91 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

73 ms

counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js

counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js

53 ms

19.png

19.png

51 ms

21.png

21.png

52 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

80 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

53 ms

shares.json

shares.json

70 ms

layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js

layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js

13 ms

Accessibility Review

qstec.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

qstec.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

qstec.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qstec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qstec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qstec.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of QSTec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: