Tools & Wizards About Us
qtake.cloud screenshot

Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

qtake.cloud

Live streaming from the film set to your screen. Powered by QTAKE Cloud.

Page Load Speed

415 ms in total

First Response

58 ms

Resources Loaded

232 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

qtake.cloud screenshot

About Website

Welcome to qtake.cloud homepage info - get ready to check QTAKE best content right away, or after learning these important things about qtake.cloud

The ultimate remote shooting solutions for professional filmmakers. Multi-camera with metadata. Near-zero latency. Hollywood-grade security.

Visit qtake.cloud

Key Findings

We analyzed Qtake.cloud page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 357 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qtake.cloud performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qtake.cloud

58 ms

qtake.cloud

37 ms

reset.min.css

38 ms

bootstrap.min.css

10 ms

font.css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Qtake.cloud, 18% (4 requests) were made to In2core.com and 14% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (99 ms) relates to the external source In2core.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

306.1 kB

After Optimization

266.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qtake.cloud main page is 306.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 205.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 16.5 kB
  • After minification 13.3 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 205.7 kB
  • After minification 205.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. QTAKE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 885 B

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

  • Original 56.4 kB
  • After minification 44.7 kB
  • After compression 30.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qtake.cloud needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (67%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of QTAKE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qtake.cloud

qtake.cloud

58 ms

qtake.cloud

qtake.cloud

37 ms

reset.min.css

reset.min.css

38 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

10 ms

font.css

font.css

16 ms

style.css

style.css

15 ms

modernizr-2.8.3-respond-1.4.2.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3-respond-1.4.2.min.js

16 ms

animate.css

animate.css

18 ms

main.css

main.css

15 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

62 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

76 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

17 ms

cookieconsent_qtakecloud.css

cookieconsent_qtakecloud.css

95 ms

cookieconsent.js

cookieconsent.js

98 ms

cookieconsent-init.js

cookieconsent-init.js

99 ms

QTAKECloud_logo.png

QTAKECloud_logo.png

12 ms

products_icons_QTAKE.png

products_icons_QTAKE.png

12 ms

products_icons_QTAKE_Server.png

products_icons_QTAKE_Server.png

20 ms

products_icons_ScreenPortSDI.png

products_icons_ScreenPortSDI.png

12 ms

313A1F_5_0.woff

313A1F_5_0.woff

15 ms

cookieconsent_qtakecloud.css

cookieconsent_qtakecloud.css

8 ms

313A1F_2_0.woff

313A1F_2_0.woff

10 ms

Accessibility Review

qtake.cloud accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

qtake.cloud best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

qtake.cloud SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qtake.cloud can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qtake.cloud main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qtake.cloud

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of QTAKE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: