Tools & Wizards About Us
qteq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

qteq.com

HOME | Qteq

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

qteq.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Qteq content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qteq.com

Visit qteq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qteq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qteq.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.qteq.com

55 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

32 ms

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

230 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Qteq.com, 42% (25 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 32% (19 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 465.9 kB (56%)

Content Size

831.4 kB

After Optimization

365.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Qteq.com main page is 831.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 448.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 357.7 kB

  • Original 448.7 kB
  • After minification 447.2 kB
  • After compression 91.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 357.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 108.0 kB

  • Original 173.9 kB
  • After minification 65.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qteq needs image optimization as it can save up to 108.0 kB or 62% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 192 B

  • Original 208.9 kB
  • After minification 208.8 kB
  • After compression 208.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (30%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qteq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.qteq.com

www.qteq.com

55 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

32 ms

minified.js

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

230 ms

thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js

62 ms

main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js

main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js

62 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

65 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

63 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

64 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

63 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

64 ms

43dd9c_88c5951fc4ce4b52bb05a7ea1e1e235cf000.jpg

43dd9c_88c5951fc4ce4b52bb05a7ea1e1e235cf000.jpg

1093 ms

43dd9c_34b076243dbb49fba78f9af259ae4f6a~mv2.png

43dd9c_34b076243dbb49fba78f9af259ae4f6a~mv2.png

447 ms

43dd9c_db9ae01795104705aae380011e3170be~mv2.png

43dd9c_db9ae01795104705aae380011e3170be~mv2.png

366 ms

43dd9c_fbf060d7bf4d4f2d8946f9d8b56bdf21~mv2.png

43dd9c_fbf060d7bf4d4f2d8946f9d8b56bdf21~mv2.png

464 ms

43dd9c_2735f0d67d054d2b9dc32a4892fc9aa5~mv2.png

43dd9c_2735f0d67d054d2b9dc32a4892fc9aa5~mv2.png

470 ms

43dd9c_31e7fe4b98fe40c3a501347a04520ca5~mv2.png

43dd9c_31e7fe4b98fe40c3a501347a04520ca5~mv2.png

485 ms

icons-3.png

icons-3.png

1353 ms

icons-1.png

icons-1.png

578 ms

icons-2.png

icons-2.png

568 ms

icons-4.png

icons-4.png

587 ms

icons-5.png

icons-5.png

640 ms

43dd9c_d7c42aabb4f142d1874431767d706edd~mv2.jpg

43dd9c_d7c42aabb4f142d1874431767d706edd~mv2.jpg

876 ms

43dd9c_179e30133f3e45ec8f9a571fdd7c56f9~mv2.jpg

43dd9c_179e30133f3e45ec8f9a571fdd7c56f9~mv2.jpg

804 ms

43dd9c_726016f8820d41b6842cc538c9e7e615~mv2.jpg

43dd9c_726016f8820d41b6842cc538c9e7e615~mv2.jpg

816 ms

43dd9c_9036a5a3cb1e45f4876ad2262df77f5f~mv2.png

43dd9c_9036a5a3cb1e45f4876ad2262df77f5f~mv2.png

879 ms

43dd9c_50f6e54977514e28884bc6f04093a4e8~mv2.png

43dd9c_50f6e54977514e28884bc6f04093a4e8~mv2.png

1060 ms

43dd9c_79f0340f486b434d8e595e0c6ff4d66f~mv2.jpg

43dd9c_79f0340f486b434d8e595e0c6ff4d66f~mv2.jpg

1119 ms

43dd9c_d4bd2f79443844d1821b217037892550~mv2.png

43dd9c_d4bd2f79443844d1821b217037892550~mv2.png

1949 ms

43dd9c_391a7a0546a84b818870b8f22742a30c~mv2.png

43dd9c_391a7a0546a84b818870b8f22742a30c~mv2.png

1017 ms

43dd9c_538ebfe72bc44df79afa42bbc65ee56b~mv2.png

43dd9c_538ebfe72bc44df79afa42bbc65ee56b~mv2.png

1217 ms

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

80 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

82 ms

p0A1C4_gK5NzKtuGSwNurQ.woff

p0A1C4_gK5NzKtuGSwNurQ.woff

55 ms

h3r77AwDsldr1E_2g4qqGBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

h3r77AwDsldr1E_2g4qqGBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

40 ms

file.woff

file.woff

893 ms

file.woff

file.woff

1004 ms

file.woff

file.woff

919 ms

file.woff

file.woff

1018 ms

file.woff

file.woff

947 ms

110 ms

127 ms

127 ms

123 ms

124 ms

121 ms

139 ms

162 ms

160 ms

161 ms

159 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

16 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

5 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

11 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

qteq.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

qteq.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

qteq.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qteq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qteq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qteq.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qteq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: