Tools & Wizards About Us
quadwall.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

quadwall.co.uk

Quadwall UK | Heavy Duty Cardboard | Heavy Duty Cardboard Boxes

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

273 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

151 ms

quadwall.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Quadwall content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about quadwall.co.uk

Specialists in heavy duty cardboard IBC containers - the low cost, space saving alternative to a Schutz container. Visit now to browse our range.

Visit quadwall.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Quadwall.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

quadwall.co.uk performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.quadwall.co.uk

273 ms

reset.css

77 ms

style.css

154 ms

nivo.css

154 ms

style.css

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Quadwall.co.uk, 9% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (334 ms) belongs to the original domain Quadwall.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

372.9 kB

After Optimization

305.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Quadwall.co.uk main page is 372.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 242.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 25.3 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 42.7 kB

  • Original 242.4 kB
  • After minification 199.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Quadwall needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 92.9 kB
  • After minification 92.9 kB
  • After compression 91.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 8.5 kB
  • After minification 8.5 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Quadwall.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (43%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quadwall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.quadwall.co.uk

www.quadwall.co.uk

273 ms

reset.css

reset.css

77 ms

style.css

style.css

154 ms

nivo.css

nivo.css

154 ms

style.css

style.css

157 ms

style_black.css

style_black.css

156 ms

comment-reply.js

comment-reply.js

157 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

235 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

229 ms

Myriad_Pro_400-Myriad_Pro_600-Myriad_Pro_italic_400-Myriad_Pro_italic_600.font.js

Myriad_Pro_400-Myriad_Pro_600-Myriad_Pro_italic_400-Myriad_Pro_italic_600.font.js

305 ms

cufon.js

cufon.js

228 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

232 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.2.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.2.pack.js

245 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

304 ms

general.js

general.js

311 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

334 ms

16635.js

16635.js

52 ms

ga.js

ga.js

25 ms

bgr_body.jpg

bgr_body.jpg

87 ms

logo.png

logo.png

87 ms

bgr_menu.jpg

bgr_menu.jpg

88 ms

ico_grey_dot.png

ico_grey_dot.png

89 ms

searchBox.png

searchBox.png

88 ms

slider1Quadwall.jpg

slider1Quadwall.jpg

228 ms

bgr_featured_content_top.jpg

bgr_featured_content_top.jpg

230 ms

bgr_featured_content_bot.png

bgr_featured_content_bot.png

231 ms

thumb.php

thumb.php

161 ms

demoVideo.jpg

demoVideo.jpg

160 ms

frontIndustries.jpg

frontIndustries.jpg

315 ms

bgr_footer_top.png

bgr_footer_top.png

239 ms

bgr_footer_bot.jpg

bgr_footer_bot.jpg

238 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

305 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

308 ms

google.png

google.png

307 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

38 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

ico_zoom.png

ico_zoom.png

270 ms

like.php

like.php

101 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

26 ms

settings

settings

71 ms

MMffjA1mbNQ.css

MMffjA1mbNQ.css

20 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

3 ms

embeds

embeds

24 ms

follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

12 ms

Accessibility Review

quadwall.co.uk accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

quadwall.co.uk best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

quadwall.co.uk SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quadwall.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Quadwall.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

quadwall.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Quadwall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: