2.9 sec in total
80 ms
1.4 sec
1.5 sec
Welcome to qualificationcheck.com homepage info - get ready to check Qualification Check best content for Nigeria right away, or after learning these important things about qualificationcheck.com
Qualification Check intuitive verification solutions are trusted by thousands of organisations worldwide, helping protect them from fraud. Visit our website for more details.
Visit qualificationcheck.comWe analyzed Qualificationcheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
qualificationcheck.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
80 ms
427 ms
20 ms
36 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Qualificationcheck.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Static.zdassets.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (520 ms) belongs to the original domain Qualificationcheck.com.
Page size can be reduced by 380.3 kB (11%)
3.3 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Qualificationcheck.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 151.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qualification Check images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualificationcheck.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (48%)
86
45
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qualification Check. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qualificationcheck.com
80 ms
qualificationcheck.com
427 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
20 ms
swiper.min.css
36 ms
post-6.css
35 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
44 ms
all.min.css
29 ms
v4-shims.min.css
40 ms
global.css
36 ms
post-7016.css
45 ms
style.min.css
42 ms
theme.min.css
52 ms
header-footer.min.css
53 ms
post-28.css
54 ms
post-5159.css
56 ms
text-animations.min.css
58 ms
frontend.min.css
60 ms
v4-shims.min.js
90 ms
jquery.min.js
93 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
106 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
115 ms
logo_white.svg
33 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
24 ms
snippet.js
66 ms
animations.min.css
42 ms
particles.js
42 ms
jarallax.min.js
43 ms
parallax.min.js
44 ms
tracker.js
38 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
47 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
48 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
47 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
46 ms
slick.min.js
54 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
57 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
53 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
55 ms
hooks.min.js
58 ms
i18n.min.js
54 ms
frontend.min.js
85 ms
waypoints.min.js
91 ms
core.min.js
86 ms
frontend.min.js
87 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
88 ms
frontend.min.js
94 ms
modal-popups.min.js
97 ms
logo_cisi.jpg
101 ms
logo_ecctis.jpg
99 ms
logo_engineering-new-zealand.jpg
103 ms
logo_Imperial_College_London_2.jpg
101 ms
logo_Teesside_university.jpg
260 ms
logo_uni_liverpool.jpg
104 ms
logo_University_of_Cambridge.jpg
107 ms
logo_university-of-bath.jpg
105 ms
logo_wes.jpg
253 ms
logo_Univ_glasgow.jpg
254 ms
logo_zambia.jpg
256 ms
logo_king_college_london_2.jpg
254 ms
logo_Fidelity.jpg
228 ms
logo_bloomsbury-institute.jpg
228 ms
logo_Imperial_College_London-1.jpg
229 ms
logo_access-Group.jpg
229 ms
logo_Egon_Zehnder.jpg
230 ms
logo_Heidrick_Struggles.jpg
228 ms
logo_odgers-berndtson.jpg
229 ms
logo_bqa.jpg
227 ms
logo_goc.jpg
229 ms
logo_Saqa.jpg
231 ms
tablet_laptop_and_smartphone_composition_3-1024x749.png
229 ms
girl_home_3-901x1024.png
228 ms
hat_3.png
225 ms
glass_3.png
222 ms
stethoscope_3.png
226 ms
temple_3.png
227 ms
unnamed-8-1024x627.png
227 ms
unnamed-3-1024x623.png
199 ms
Global-verification-admissions-plus.png
198 ms
unnamed-4-1024x522.png
196 ms
unnamed-33-1024x520.png
192 ms
unnamed-9-1024x521.png
191 ms
unnamed-6-1024x625.png
188 ms
Phil-Dupont5_3.jpg
185 ms
Screenshot-2024-06-22-at-19.49.20-1024x151.png
191 ms
crown.png
186 ms
urs.png
184 ms
pbsa.png
184 ms
TAICEP-LOGO-STACKED-01-1-1024x804.png
186 ms
icon.png
186 ms
OpenSans-Light.ttf
12 ms
OpenSans-Regular-1.ttf
433 ms
OpenSans-Medium.ttf
42 ms
OpenSans-SemiBold.ttf
40 ms
OpenSans-Bold.ttf
41 ms
OpenSans-ExtraBold.ttf
40 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
520 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
355 ms
qualificationcheck.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
qualificationcheck.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
qualificationcheck.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualificationcheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qualificationcheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qualificationcheck.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Qualification Check. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: