Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

qualityoflife.net

Quality of Life Supplements | Quality of Life

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

341 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

710 ms

qualityoflife.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to qualityoflife.net homepage info - get ready to check Quality Of Life best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about qualityoflife.net

Quality of Life offers high-quality nutritional products with ingredients 100% backed by clinical research. We have a great selection of nutritional supplements for your brain, cardiovascular health, ...

Visit qualityoflife.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Qualityoflife.net page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qualityoflife.net performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,000 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.308

38/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qualityoflife.net

341 ms

model

73 ms

event

162 ms

dot.txt

139 ms

px_C2FLJ.js

155 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Qualityoflife.net, 11% (11 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Static.klaviyo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (985 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 351.1 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Qualityoflife.net main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 179.2 kB

  • Original 238.2 kB
  • After minification 203.8 kB
  • After compression 59.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 110.3 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quality Of Life images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 506.4 kB
  • After minification 506.4 kB
  • After compression 491.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 46.9 kB

  • Original 108.6 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 61.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualityoflife.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.9 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (65%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quality Of Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

qualityoflife.net accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

qualityoflife.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

qualityoflife.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualityoflife.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qualityoflife.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Quality Of Life. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: