Tools & Wizards About Us
qualityprocess.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

qualityprocess.com

Quality Process | Design + Technology + Big Ideas = Value

Page Load Speed

802 ms in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

316 ms

Page Rendered

449 ms

qualityprocess.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to qualityprocess.com homepage info - get ready to check Quality Process best content right away, or after learning these important things about qualityprocess.com

We are Quality Process, a team of big thinkers, practical optimists, visionary coders, strategic designers. We combine strategic thinking designed to capture a business advantage with a right-sized pr...

Visit qualityprocess.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qualityprocess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 765 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qualityprocess.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.101

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qualityprocess.com

37 ms

normalize.css

4 ms

grid.css

17 ms

css3menu.css

17 ms

global.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Qualityprocess.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (110 ms) belongs to the original domain Qualityprocess.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 29.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

576.8 kB

After Optimization

547.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Qualityprocess.com main page is 576.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 502.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 26.6 kB
  • After minification 18.0 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 502.9 kB
  • After minification 501.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quality Process images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 47.4 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 42.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (23%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quality Process. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qualityprocess.com

qualityprocess.com

37 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

4 ms

grid.css

grid.css

17 ms

css3menu.css

css3menu.css

17 ms

global.css

global.css

17 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

15 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

21 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

56 ms

freewall.js

freewall.js

22 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

css2

css2

55 ms

quality-process-logo.png

quality-process-logo.png

110 ms

bssp-icon.jpg

bssp-icon.jpg

10 ms

sales-icon.jpg

sales-icon.jpg

7 ms

om-icon.jpg

om-icon.jpg

10 ms

hr-surveys-icon.jpg

hr-surveys-icon.jpg

11 ms

philanthropy-icon.jpg

philanthropy-icon.jpg

10 ms

mz-icon.jpg

mz-icon.jpg

9 ms

rain-icon.jpg

rain-icon.jpg

11 ms

gnomads-icon.jpg

gnomads-icon.jpg

18 ms

advisor-icon.jpg

advisor-icon.jpg

22 ms

medical-icon.jpg

medical-icon.jpg

20 ms

asbuilt-icon.jpg

asbuilt-icon.jpg

19 ms

elearning-icon.jpg

elearning-icon.jpg

17 ms

hr-survey-icon.jpg

hr-survey-icon.jpg

19 ms

seti-icon.jpg

seti-icon.jpg

21 ms

top-home.jpg

top-home.jpg

24 ms

title-back.png

title-back.png

79 ms

home-back-who.jpg

home-back-who.jpg

25 ms

icon-design.jpg

icon-design.jpg

25 ms

icon-technology.jpg

icon-technology.jpg

25 ms

icon-big-ideas.jpg

icon-big-ideas.jpg

24 ms

icon-value.jpg

icon-value.jpg

25 ms

qp-logo-footer.png

qp-logo-footer.png

26 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

27 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

33 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

44 ms

BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95DiC.ttf

BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95DiC.ttf

50 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKQHWP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKQHWP9.ttf

50 ms

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKpHWP9.ttf

c4m61nF8G8_s6gHhIOX0IYBo_KKpHWP9.ttf

78 ms

Accessibility Review

qualityprocess.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

qualityprocess.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

qualityprocess.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualityprocess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qualityprocess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qualityprocess.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Quality Process. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: