Tools & Wizards About Us
qualityresumebuilder.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

qualityresumebuilder.com

A Betterjobsearch.com - Resume Writing Service List & Directory

Page Load Speed

25.8 sec in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

22.7 sec

Page Rendered

3.1 sec

qualityresumebuilder.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to qualityresumebuilder.com homepage info - get ready to check Quality Resume Builder best content right away, or after learning these important things about qualityresumebuilder.com

Be smart: meet with your writer and see before you buy. Work in person to get a better quality resume. National resume writer list & directory.

Visit qualityresumebuilder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qualityresumebuilder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 25.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

qualityresumebuilder.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qualityresumebuilder.com

34 ms

resumeservices.html

54 ms

resumeservices.html

220 ms

master.css

133 ms

icwebsiteelement.css

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Qualityresumebuilder.com, 63% (44 requests) were made to Betterjobsearch.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Quiethits.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 121.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

498.0 kB

After Optimization

376.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qualityresumebuilder.com main page is 498.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 254.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 107.2 kB

  • Original 140.6 kB
  • After minification 130.8 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 172 B

  • Original 100.2 kB
  • After minification 100.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quality Resume Builder images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 254.4 kB
  • After minification 254.4 kB
  • After compression 241.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualityresumebuilder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (43%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quality Resume Builder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

qualityresumebuilder.com

qualityresumebuilder.com

34 ms

resumeservices.html

resumeservices.html

54 ms

resumeservices.html

resumeservices.html

220 ms

master.css

master.css

133 ms

icwebsiteelement.css

icwebsiteelement.css

135 ms

ic_globals_published.js

ic_globals_published.js

134 ms

user.js

user.js

158 ms

photoalbum.js

photoalbum.js

214 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

91 ms

trackingCode.js

trackingCode.js

50 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

28 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

21 ms

trafficg.js

trafficg.js

33 ms

trafficg2.js

trafficg2.js

41 ms

59 ms

ga.js

ga.js

33 ms

left_back.jpg

left_back.jpg

113 ms

01b.jpg

01b.jpg

337 ms

02b.jpg

02b.jpg

300 ms

03b.jpg

03b.jpg

109 ms

04b.jpg

04b.jpg

110 ms

05b.jpg

05b.jpg

121 ms

06b.jpg

06b.jpg

218 ms

07b.jpg

07b.jpg

211 ms

08b.jpg

08b.jpg

220 ms

09b.jpg

09b.jpg

227 ms

10b.jpg

10b.jpg

314 ms

top_back.jpg

top_back.jpg

332 ms

motif01.jpg

motif01.jpg

323 ms

nav_back.jpg

nav_back.jpg

334 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

398 ms

01a.jpg

01a.jpg

423 ms

02a.jpg

02a.jpg

437 ms

03a.jpg

03a.jpg

443 ms

04a.jpg

04a.jpg

435 ms

05a.jpg

05a.jpg

435 ms

06a.jpg

06a.jpg

532 ms

07a.jpg

07a.jpg

527 ms

08a.jpg

08a.jpg

562 ms

09a.jpg

09a.jpg

544 ms

10a.jpg

10a.jpg

541 ms

motif02.jpg

motif02.jpg

542 ms

clouds4_03.jpg

clouds4_03.jpg

642 ms

company.jpg

company.jpg

658 ms

clouds4_06.jpg

clouds4_06.jpg

640 ms

slogan.jpg

slogan.jpg

640 ms

clouds4_08.jpg

clouds4_08.jpg

657 ms

clouds4_09.jpg

clouds4_09.jpg

662 ms

cn_back02.jpg

cn_back02.jpg

741 ms

cn_back.jpg

cn_back.jpg

761 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

742 ms

19 ms

quant.js

quant.js

24 ms

fbds.js

fbds.js

23 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

18 ms

work.php

work.php

20027 ms

32 ms

28 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

17 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

35 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

32 ms

getban2.php

getban2.php

301 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

76 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

821 ms

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

21 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

9 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

eh1mp.jpg

eh1mp.jpg

1726 ms

main.js

main.js

9 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

18 ms

Accessibility Review

qualityresumebuilder.com accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

qualityresumebuilder.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

qualityresumebuilder.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualityresumebuilder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qualityresumebuilder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qualityresumebuilder.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Quality Resume Builder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: