2.3 sec in total
74 ms
1.9 sec
346 ms
Visit quetica.com now to see the best up-to-date Quetica content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about quetica.com
Quetica is an innovative SDVOSB consulting and engineering design firm led by industry experts with deep expertise in Freight Planning, Supply Chain Management and Optimization, Engineering and Forens...
Visit quetica.comWe analyzed Quetica.com page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
quetica.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.296
40/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
74 ms
65 ms
22 ms
49 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Quetica.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.googleapis.com.
Page size can be reduced by 437.6 kB (26%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Quetica.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 562.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 118.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Quetica needs image optimization as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 244.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Quetica.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 244.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (81%)
64
12
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quetica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
quetica.com
74 ms
quetica.com
65 ms
layerslider.css
22 ms
style.min.css
49 ms
styles.css
59 ms
all.min.css
68 ms
bootstrap.min.css
55 ms
front.css
52 ms
email-before-download-public.css
63 ms
style.css
80 ms
responsive.css
97 ms
icons.css
93 ms
dynamic-styles.css
92 ms
settings.css
99 ms
fontello.css
100 ms
css
42 ms
css
42 ms
css
43 ms
js_composer.min.css
117 ms
script.min.js
142 ms
jquery.min.js
143 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
152 ms
layerslider.utils.js
154 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
176 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
174 ms
popper.min.js
175 ms
bootstrap.min.js
183 ms
front.js
188 ms
css
1620 ms
css
40 ms
css
41 ms
rs6.css
241 ms
hooks.min.js
242 ms
i18n.min.js
243 ms
index.js
242 ms
index.js
243 ms
jquery.form.min.js
243 ms
rbtools.min.js
244 ms
rs6.min.js
245 ms
dlm-xhr.min.js
246 ms
email-before-download-public.js
246 ms
scripts.js
270 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
246 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
270 ms
jquery.validate.js
258 ms
responsivecarousel.min.js
229 ms
jquery.owl.carousel.min.js
226 ms
core.min.js
223 ms
menu.min.js
222 ms
dom-ready.min.js
217 ms
a11y.min.js
239 ms
autocomplete.min.js
220 ms
jquery.custom.js
210 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
212 ms
esg.min.js
221 ms
app.js
79 ms
Quetica-CE-logo-trans-long-2.png
77 ms
quetica-logo-1601-Clear-Background.png
121 ms
dummy.png
129 ms
Picture2-80x80.png
125 ms
supply-chain_l.jpg
116 ms
Technology_l.jpg
119 ms
finance-trade-payments_l.jpg
130 ms
Home_Infographic_engineering-e1492122822308.jpg
136 ms
Service-Disabled-Veteran-Owned-Certified.png
132 ms
quetica-site-lt521-150x150.png
140 ms
Icomoon.woff
158 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
150 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
147 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
141 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
145 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
174 ms
hbicons.ttf
149 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
28 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
29 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
29 ms
quetica.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
quetica.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
quetica.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quetica.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Quetica.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
quetica.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Quetica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: