Tools & Wizards About Us
quickdraft.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

quickdraft.com

Pneumatic Conveying and Exhaust Systems - Quickdraft

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

747 ms

Page Rendered

282 ms

quickdraft.com screenshot

About Website

Visit quickdraft.com now to see the best up-to-date Quickdraft content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about quickdraft.com

Discover why Quickdraft pneumatic converying systems provide unparalledled reliability and efficiency, keeping both your metals and profits moving!

Visit quickdraft.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Quickdraft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

quickdraft.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.quickdraft.com

11 ms

www.quickdraft.com

85 ms

style.min.css

23 ms

css

46 ms

settings.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Quickdraft.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (321 ms) belongs to the original domain Quickdraft.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 49.3 kB (6%)

Content Size

886.7 kB

After Optimization

837.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Quickdraft.com main page is 886.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 412.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 44.1 kB

  • Original 55.9 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 700 B

  • Original 412.6 kB
  • After minification 411.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quickdraft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 261.5 kB
  • After minification 261.5 kB
  • After compression 259.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 156.7 kB
  • After minification 156.7 kB
  • After compression 154.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Quickdraft.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (39%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quickdraft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.quickdraft.com

www.quickdraft.com

11 ms

www.quickdraft.com

www.quickdraft.com

85 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

23 ms

css

css

46 ms

settings.css

settings.css

26 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

31 ms

style.css

style.css

41 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

77 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

100 ms

featherlight.min.css

featherlight.min.css

155 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

56 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

75 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

82 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

92 ms

js

js

78 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

106 ms

e843c1cfb484e00628b0414466be0b4f.js

e843c1cfb484e00628b0414466be0b4f.js

146 ms

css

css

13 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

186 ms

Header-Background.jpg

Header-Background.jpg

174 ms

Quickdraft-Logo-1.png

Quickdraft-Logo-1.png

175 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

124 ms

food-conveying.jpg

food-conveying.jpg

123 ms

food-processing-exhaust.jpg

food-processing-exhaust.jpg

174 ms

exhaust-systems-1.jpg

exhaust-systems-1.jpg

174 ms

metals-conveying.jpg

metals-conveying.jpg

173 ms

material-conveying.jpg

material-conveying.jpg

173 ms

DSC_1501.jpg

DSC_1501.jpg

229 ms

DSC_1410.jpg

DSC_1410.jpg

228 ms

DSC_1488.jpg

DSC_1488.jpg

214 ms

TIA.jpg

TIA.jpg

196 ms

PackExpo.jpg

PackExpo.jpg

196 ms

Bottom-Background.jpg

Bottom-Background.jpg

207 ms

litzler-footer.png

litzler-footer.png

233 ms

psc.png

psc.png

237 ms

litz-foudy.png

litz-foudy.png

243 ms

ISO-1-e1524080416123.png

ISO-1-e1524080416123.png

250 ms

Quickdraft-Logo-text.png

Quickdraft-Logo-text.png

260 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

267 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

277 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

297 ms

instagram.svg

instagram.svg

305 ms

Nunito-Regular.woff

Nunito-Regular.woff

281 ms

Nunito-SemiBold.woff

Nunito-SemiBold.woff

290 ms

Nunito-ExtraLight.woff

Nunito-ExtraLight.woff

304 ms

Nunito-Bold.woff

Nunito-Bold.woff

311 ms

Nunito-ExtraBold.woff

Nunito-ExtraBold.woff

321 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

140 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

19 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

145 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

160 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

177 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

79 ms

Accessibility Review

quickdraft.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

quickdraft.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

quickdraft.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quickdraft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Quickdraft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

quickdraft.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Quickdraft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: