8.6 sec in total
613 ms
7.6 sec
409 ms
Visit quickreviewer.com now to see the best up-to-date Quickreviewer content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about quickreviewer.com
QuickReviewer, Online proofing software is trusted by agencies to streamline their creative workflow. Want to get instant feedback and approval? Register!
Visit quickreviewer.comWe analyzed Quickreviewer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 613 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
quickreviewer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.376
28/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
613 ms
1684 ms
584 ms
1023 ms
875 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Quickreviewer.com, 18% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Quickreviewer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 194.5 kB (18%)
1.1 MB
893.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Quickreviewer.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 628.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 124.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quickreviewer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 427 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Quickreviewer.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (48%)
58
30
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quickreviewer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
quickreviewer.com
613 ms
www.quickreviewer.com
1684 ms
style.min.css
584 ms
styles.css
1023 ms
theme.css
875 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
1029 ms
style.css
1629 ms
css
32 ms
dashicons.min.css
1180 ms
jquery.min.js
1351 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1166 ms
Popup.js
1350 ms
PopupConfig.js
1352 ms
PopupBuilder.js
1467 ms
qrv2.js
15 ms
botdistribution.min.js
306 ms
et-divi-customizer-global-17254356488529.min.css
1439 ms
moment.min.js
1459 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1459 ms
masonry.min.js
1460 ms
frontend.js
1514 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1515 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1640 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1656 ms
hooks.min.js
1678 ms
i18n.min.js
1672 ms
index.js
1768 ms
index.js
1781 ms
custom.min.js
2263 ms
common.js
1961 ms
gtm.js
157 ms
fbevents.js
91 ms
qr-logo-dark-small.png
566 ms
home-header-2021-image.png
1174 ms
ad-agency.png
652 ms
home.png
666 ms
our-customers2.png
840 ms
logos3.jpg
944 ms
logos1.jpg
951 ms
logos2.jpg
973 ms
comments-1.png
1406 ms
annotation-tools.png
1156 ms
approval.png
1444 ms
zoom-1.png
1519 ms
drag-drop.png
1255 ms
folder.png
1445 ms
share-1.png
1473 ms
notifications.png
1548 ms
comment.png
1689 ms
approve.png
1829 ms
versions.png
1832 ms
compare.png
1831 ms
white-label.png
1807 ms
templates.png
1842 ms
group-qr.png
1926 ms
status.png
2049 ms
qr-integrations.png
2076 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
55 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
67 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
84 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
105 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
106 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
107 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
108 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
105 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
107 ms
modules.ttf
2084 ms
g2-capterra-quickreviewer.png
2022 ms
gtm.js
55 ms
background-black-coffee-cactus-951228.jpg
1528 ms
how-qr-works.jpg
1363 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf
14 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
13 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-vNiXg7Q.ttf
14 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
15 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
15 ms
quickreviewer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
quickreviewer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
quickreviewer.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quickreviewer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Quickreviewer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
quickreviewer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Quickreviewer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: