Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ar.rosegal.com

Plus Size Clothing, Plus Size Dress Online Store | Rosegal

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

785 ms

ar.rosegal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ar.rosegal.com homepage info - get ready to check Ar Rosegal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ar.rosegal.com

Shop the latest cheap plus size clothing for curves & mens fashion styles online with free shipping, including plus size dresses, plus size swimwear, accessories, jewelry and other trendy styles at af...

Visit ar.rosegal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ar.rosegal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ar.rosegal.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,210 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ar.rosegal.com

36 ms

ar.rosegal.com

29 ms

www.rosegal.com

31 ms

common_min.css

125 ms

31948fb1d9d6301a055f353385fec643.css

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ar.rosegal.com, 17% (17 requests) were made to Css.rglcdn.com and 12% (12 requests) were made to Geshopcss.logsss.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (680 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 609.4 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Ar.rosegal.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 854.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 456.8 kB

  • Original 576.3 kB
  • After minification 568.5 kB
  • After compression 119.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 456.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 126.0 kB

  • Original 854.6 kB
  • After minification 728.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ar Rosegal needs image optimization as it can save up to 126.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 190.3 kB
  • After minification 190.3 kB
  • After compression 164.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 891 B

  • Original 28.4 kB
  • After minification 28.4 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ar.rosegal.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (60%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ar Rosegal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ar.rosegal.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ar.rosegal.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ar.rosegal.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ar.rosegal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ar.rosegal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ar Rosegal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: