Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

calendar.reviewjournal.com

Events | Home and Garden | Life

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

148 ms

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

699 ms

calendar.reviewjournal.com screenshot

About Website

Visit calendar.reviewjournal.com now to see the best up-to-date Calendar Reviewjournal content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about calendar.reviewjournal.com

July 16

Visit calendar.reviewjournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Calendar.reviewjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

calendar.reviewjournal.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,100 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.906

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value39.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

calendar.reviewjournal.com

148 ms

events

759 ms

css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css

71 ms

css_ab1uZZA5rsT63MrnYjNLGrLXjyaE0Mrzd-Q6K0qPVz0.css

142 ms

css_qB45nIRQ8UfTPgzKiEvG0tL53j0-q0w8CCLPzNZt7bc.css

145 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Calendar.reviewjournal.com, 25% (32 requests) were made to M.reviewjournal.com and 24% (31 requests) were made to Lvrj-etweb.newsengin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) relates to the external source Platform.tout.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (26%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Calendar.reviewjournal.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 139.3 kB

  • Original 192.0 kB
  • After minification 191.4 kB
  • After compression 52.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 201.1 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Calendar Reviewjournal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 802.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 443.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 802.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 76.5 kB

  • Original 91.7 kB
  • After minification 71.0 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Calendar.reviewjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (57%)

Requests Now

122

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 122 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Calendar Reviewjournal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

calendar.reviewjournal.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

calendar.reviewjournal.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

calendar.reviewjournal.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Calendar.reviewjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Calendar.reviewjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Calendar Reviewjournal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: