Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

content.relayware.com

All-in-ONE Channel Management Solution - Zift Solutions

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

609 ms

content.relayware.com screenshot

About Website

Visit content.relayware.com now to see the best up-to-date Content Relayware content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about content.relayware.com

Real solutions for your complex channel program. More than 80% of channel chiefs and more than half a million partners rely on Zift Solutions to drive channel success.

Visit content.relayware.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Content.relayware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

content.relayware.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.4 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,290 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.112

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

content.relayware.com

128 ms

content.relayware.com

195 ms

ziftsolutions.com

44 ms

b2195.css

24 ms

css

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Content.relayware.com, 40% (16 requests) were made to Ziftsolutions.com and 25% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (375 ms) relates to the external source Assets.adoberesources.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 381.9 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

646.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Content.relayware.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 654.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 146.5 kB

  • Original 179.0 kB
  • After minification 175.0 kB
  • After compression 32.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 113.4 kB

  • Original 654.5 kB
  • After minification 654.5 kB
  • After compression 541.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 113.4 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 122.0 kB

  • Original 195.1 kB
  • After minification 74.4 kB
  • After compression 73.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Content.relayware.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (92%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Relayware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

content.relayware.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

content.relayware.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

content.relayware.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Content.relayware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Content.relayware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Content Relayware. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: