6.1 sec in total
2.3 sec
3.7 sec
111 ms
Visit discuss.repx.me now to see the best up-to-date Discuss RepX content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about discuss.repx.me
Visit discuss.repx.meWe analyzed Discuss.repx.me page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
discuss.repx.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
96/100
10%
Value1.8 s
98/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.5 s
100/100
10%
2262 ms
226 ms
194 ms
356 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Discuss.repx.me and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Discuss.repx.me.
Page size can be reduced by 18.1 kB (61%)
29.5 kB
11.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Discuss.repx.me main page is 29.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 12.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 162 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Discuss RepX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Discuss.repx.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (74%)
27
7
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Discuss RepX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
discuss.repx.me
2262 ms
styleswitcher.js
226 ms
forum_fn.js
194 ms
style.php
356 ms
normal.css
96 ms
wiki2.png
44 ms
cron.php
1100 ms
border_left.gif
76 ms
border_right.gif
83 ms
border_top.gif
79 ms
border_top_left.gif
97 ms
border_top_right.gif
104 ms
bg_header.gif
113 ms
corners_left2.png
118 ms
corners_right2.png
133 ms
corners_left.png
152 ms
corners_right.png
157 ms
icon_home.gif
153 ms
icon_fontsize.gif
158 ms
icon_faq.gif
182 ms
icon_register.gif
200 ms
icon_logout.gif
193 ms
bg_button.gif
211 ms
border_bottom2.gif
197 ms
border_bottom.gif
232 ms
print.css
51 ms
medium.css
43 ms
large.css
43 ms
discuss.repx.me accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[accesskey] values are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
discuss.repx.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
discuss.repx.me SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Discuss.repx.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Discuss.repx.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
discuss.repx.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Discuss RepX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: