Tools & Wizards About Us
editage.rupress.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

editage.rupress.org

Publication-Focused Editing services | The Rockefeller University Press in partnership with Editage

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

874 ms

Page Rendered

299 ms

editage.rupress.org screenshot

About Website

Visit editage.rupress.org now to see the best up-to-date Editage Ru Press content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about editage.rupress.org

Accelerate the publication process by submitting a well-written manuscript. Editage in partnership with The Rockefeller University Press offers manuscript preparation services to authors wishing to su...

Visit editage.rupress.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Editage.rupress.org page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

editage.rupress.org performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.451

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

editage.rupress.org

28 ms

editage.rupress.org

118 ms

css2

33 ms

css2

50 ms

font-awesome.css

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Editage.rupress.org, 17% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (408 ms) belongs to the original domain Editage.rupress.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 29.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

194.1 kB

After Optimization

165.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Editage.rupress.org main page is 194.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 77.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 22.3 kB
  • After minification 13.9 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 77.5 kB
  • After minification 77.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Editage Ru Press images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 59.1 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 51.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 35.2 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 32.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Editage.rupress.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (29%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Editage Ru Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

editage.rupress.org

editage.rupress.org

28 ms

editage.rupress.org

editage.rupress.org

118 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

108 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

184 ms

style.css

style.css

93 ms

gdpr-script.js

gdpr-script.js

27 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

155 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

40 ms

rupress-inc.js

rupress-inc.js

87 ms

custom.js

custom.js

64 ms

banner-home.jpg

banner-home.jpg

100 ms

english-editiing-icon.png

english-editiing-icon.png

105 ms

translation-service-icon.png

translation-service-icon.png

124 ms

publication-icon.png

publication-icon.png

114 ms

voice.png

voice.png

178 ms

quality-guarantee-icon.png

quality-guarantee-icon.png

152 ms

time-icon.png

time-icon.png

268 ms

data-icon.png

data-icon.png

212 ms

manuscript-icon.png

manuscript-icon.png

187 ms

quality-icon.png

quality-icon.png

226 ms

review-icon.png

review-icon.png

272 ms

t1.jpg

t1.jpg

297 ms

New-Zealand.jpeg

New-Zealand.jpeg

276 ms

t3.png

t3.png

303 ms

Greece.jpeg

Greece.jpeg

322 ms

t2.jpg

t2.jpg

345 ms

Germany.jpeg

Germany.jpeg

386 ms

dnv-logo.png

dnv-logo.png

388 ms

HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff

HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff

282 ms

SFNS-Display.woff

SFNS-Display.woff

408 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAB0_IsE.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAB0_IsE.woff

18 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAB0_IsE.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAB0_IsE.woff

26 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5mZNCzc.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5mZNCzc.woff

34 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAB0_IsE.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAB0_IsE.woff

41 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxo6WQev.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxo6WQev.woff

40 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USewyFHi_o.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USewyFHi_o.woff

41 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVewyFHi_o.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVewyFHi_o.woff

40 ms

Gilroy-ExtraBold.woff

Gilroy-ExtraBold.woff

301 ms

Muli.woff

Muli.woff

337 ms

Accessibility Review

editage.rupress.org accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

editage.rupress.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

editage.rupress.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Editage.rupress.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Editage.rupress.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

editage.rupress.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Editage Ru Press. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: