2.9 sec in total
270 ms
2.1 sec
472 ms
Welcome to elog.rted2.net homepage info - get ready to check Elog Rted 2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about elog.rted2.net
Start your 14-Day Trial today. No credit card needed. Easy Forms, Online Database, Email Marketing, Landing Pages
Visit elog.rted2.netWe analyzed Elog.rted2.net page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
elog.rted2.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value5.1 s
24/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value1,190 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value11.2 s
19/100
10%
270 ms
325 ms
173 ms
23 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Elog.rted2.net, 78% (69 requests) were made to New.relevanttools.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (560 ms) relates to the external source New.relevanttools.com.
Page size can be reduced by 205.8 kB (21%)
968.3 kB
762.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Elog.rted2.net main page is 968.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 522.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Elog Rted 2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 41.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Elog.rted2.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (76%)
74
18
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Elog Rted 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
elog.rted2.net
270 ms
www.relevanttools.com
325 ms
new.relevanttools.com
173 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
23 ms
formidableforms.css
42 ms
blocks.style.build.css
69 ms
icons.css
52 ms
global.css
72 ms
style.min.css
45 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
145 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
111 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
80 ms
frontend.min.css
81 ms
post-1157.css
100 ms
frontend.min.css
112 ms
all.min.css
102 ms
v4-shims.min.css
136 ms
post-44.css
139 ms
frontend.css
147 ms
post-1683.css
155 ms
post-1691.css
154 ms
font-awesome.min.css
155 ms
lightslider.css
153 ms
gts-style.css
145 ms
app.css
165 ms
style.css
161 ms
css
94 ms
v4-shims.min.js
157 ms
jquery.min.js
158 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
157 ms
lightslider.min.js
160 ms
email-decode.min.js
158 ms
animations.min.css
278 ms
dismiss.js
453 ms
waypoints.min.js
280 ms
frontend.js
278 ms
themo-foot.js
275 ms
vendor_footer.js
283 ms
main.js
281 ms
core.min.js
451 ms
effect.min.js
273 ms
effect-slide.min.js
416 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
412 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
412 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
389 ms
frontend.min.js
391 ms
swiper.min.js
375 ms
share-link.min.js
374 ms
dialog.min.js
368 ms
frontend.min.js
363 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
337 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
333 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
334 ms
gtm.js
333 ms
cropped-RT-logo-8-27-21-300x69.png
367 ms
Shape3.png
290 ms
presentation.png
294 ms
circle1.png
295 ms
easy-forms-1024x626.jpg
293 ms
email-marketing-1024x566.jpg
294 ms
online-database-1024x625.jpg
295 ms
landing-page-1024x752.jpg
378 ms
steve-dup-linkedin.jpeg
365 ms
ross-rec-green-logo-md.jpg
365 ms
pastor-rob_with-son-beau_sonya-md.jpg
364 ms
Header-bg.png
365 ms
cropped-RT-logo-8-27-21-1024x237.png
560 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff
367 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWCWtFCfQ7A.woff
367 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf
184 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw3q5d0.woff
365 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff
366 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
184 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-vNiXg7Q.ttf
364 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff
364 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff
369 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
367 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
368 ms
conversion_async.js
135 ms
hotjar-2238240.js
254 ms
fbevents.js
168 ms
200 ms
268 ms
1637376646525637
173 ms
modules.bcd9ade6b0bb9bdd0789.js
100 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
77 ms
135 ms
48 ms
elog.rted2.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
elog.rted2.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
elog.rted2.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Elog.rted2.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Elog.rted2.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
elog.rted2.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Elog Rted 2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: