Tools & Wizards About Us
go.reedtech.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

go.reedtech.com

Reed Tech | Best-In-Class Information-Based Solutions and Services

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

139 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.5 sec

go.reedtech.com screenshot

About Website

Visit go.reedtech.com now to see the best up-to-date Go Reed Tech content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about go.reedtech.com

Reed Tech offers product and service solutions to help Life Sciences professionals gain control over their own and their industry’s data.

Visit go.reedtech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Go.reedtech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

go.reedtech.com performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,820 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.647

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.reedtech.com

139 ms

d8b1e248c8e44108d414130a0fdffe29.js

28 ms

e0a9909a9ef95a2e6c9f0e8138cb6b91.js

118 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

52 ms

otSDKStub.js

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Go.reedtech.com, 32% (23 requests) were made to B2097136.smushcdn.com and 28% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (738 ms) belongs to the original domain Go.reedtech.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.9 MB (28%)

Content Size

20.8 MB

After Optimization

14.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Go.reedtech.com main page is 20.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 19.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 565.6 kB

  • Original 651.1 kB
  • After minification 643.1 kB
  • After compression 85.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 565.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 5.3 MB

  • Original 19.9 MB
  • After minification 14.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Go Reed Tech needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.3 MB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 282.9 kB
  • After minification 282.9 kB
  • After compression 280.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Go.reedtech.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (43%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Go Reed Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.reedtech.com

www.reedtech.com

139 ms

d8b1e248c8e44108d414130a0fdffe29.js

d8b1e248c8e44108d414130a0fdffe29.js

28 ms

e0a9909a9ef95a2e6c9f0e8138cb6b91.js

e0a9909a9ef95a2e6c9f0e8138cb6b91.js

118 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

OtAutoBlock.js

52 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

71 ms

js

js

90 ms

js

js

173 ms

dc-script.js

dc-script.js

41 ms

317639.js

317639.js

85 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

56 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

56 ms

counter-up.min.js

counter-up.min.js

61 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

59 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

96 ms

hustle-ui.min.js

hustle-ui.min.js

78 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

83 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

80 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

89 ms

e6bd183610a617077216b5bd76ca9cc3.js

e6bd183610a617077216b5bd76ca9cc3.js

102 ms

9182e25c66d76a6fc1bab9d68a4026d8.js

9182e25c66d76a6fc1bab9d68a4026d8.js

101 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

154 ms

6caf2720f1b48ae62478f4a401409d70.js

6caf2720f1b48ae62478f4a401409d70.js

155 ms

87561ee8-514d-4016-a873-18de447c0339.json

87561ee8-514d-4016-a873-18de447c0339.json

44 ms

RT-LS-20201123-General-Logo-Full-Color.png

RT-LS-20201123-General-Logo-Full-Color.png

484 ms

Untitled%20(6).png

Untitled%20(6).png

738 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-231011-tb-57429-231320-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-231011-tb-57429-231320-late.css

27 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

489 ms

RT-LS-Icon-Biochem.png

RT-LS-Icon-Biochem.png

472 ms

RT-LS-Icon-Latest-Data.png

RT-LS-Icon-Latest-Data.png

473 ms

RT-LS-Icon-Global-Connection.png

RT-LS-Icon-Global-Connection.png

486 ms

RT-LS-Icon-Update.png

RT-LS-Icon-Update.png

485 ms

RT-LS-Icon-Pharma.png

RT-LS-Icon-Pharma.png

485 ms

RT-LS-Icon-QA.png

RT-LS-Icon-QA.png

484 ms

RT-LS-Icon-Discussion.png

RT-LS-Icon-Discussion.png

483 ms

GettyImages-1325706477.webp

GettyImages-1325706477.webp

484 ms

RTLS-CisemaBG.webp

RTLS-CisemaBG.webp

527 ms

GettyImages-723499981-scaled.jpg

GettyImages-723499981-scaled.jpg

523 ms

GettyImages-1134295967-scaled.jpg

GettyImages-1134295967-scaled.jpg

528 ms

RTLS-SSMD-EU-Proposal.png

RTLS-SSMD-EU-Proposal.png

521 ms

Untitled-4.png

Untitled-4.png

626 ms

RT-LS-AbstractImg2-scaled.webp

RT-LS-AbstractImg2-scaled.webp

520 ms

DEKRA-ISO-27001-215x300.png

DEKRA-ISO-27001-215x300.png

526 ms

MedTech-Europe-300x49.png

MedTech-Europe-300x49.png

525 ms

GS1-US-Solution-Partner-150x150.png

GS1-US-Solution-Partner-150x150.png

569 ms

RAPS-Premium-Solution-Partner-300x122.png

RAPS-Premium-Solution-Partner-300x122.png

574 ms

HL7-Logo-002-230x300-1.png

HL7-Logo-002-230x300-1.png

574 ms

2020_ReedTech_logo_white-copy-300x37.png

2020_ReedTech_logo_white-copy-300x37.png

571 ms

location

location

508 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

380 ms

image-1.jpg

image-1.jpg

436 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

76 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

125 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

161 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

161 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff

262 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

159 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

176 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

182 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff

181 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

179 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

44 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfr.woff

179 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfo.ttf

181 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_FQfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_FQfr.woff

182 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_FQfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_FQfo.ttf

184 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-s.woff

182 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-v.ttf

186 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_FQfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_FQfr.woff

256 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_FQfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_FQfo.ttf

186 ms

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-mPCQ.woff

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-mPCQ.woff

256 ms

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-mPCc.ttf

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-mPCc.ttf

257 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

93 ms

Accessibility Review

go.reedtech.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

go.reedtech.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

go.reedtech.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Go.reedtech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Go.reedtech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

go.reedtech.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Go Reed Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: