Tools & Wizards About Us
lifematters.reviewability.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

lifematters.reviewability.com

Get better feedback and positive online reviews from your customers - Lifematters

Page Load Speed

530 ms in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

402 ms

Page Rendered

71 ms

lifematters.reviewability.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lifematters.reviewability.com homepage info - get ready to check Lifematters Reviewability best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lifematters.reviewability.com

Lifematters helps you connect with your customers to get better feedback and positive online reviews.

Visit lifematters.reviewability.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifematters.reviewability.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 473 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifematters.reviewability.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifematters.reviewability.com

57 ms

lifematters.reviewability.com

88 ms

login

69 ms

locationSetup.css

35 ms

color-scheme.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lifematters.reviewability.com, 58% (28 requests) were made to Cdn.reviewability.com and 25% (12 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (152 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.reviewability.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 15.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

158.6 kB

After Optimization

142.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifematters.reviewability.com main page is 158.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 78.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 14.0 kB
  • After minification 11.9 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 32.1 kB
  • After minification 32.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifematters Reviewability images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 78.0 kB
  • After compression 75.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 34.5 kB
  • After minification 34.4 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifematters.reviewability.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (89%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifematters Reviewability. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifematters.reviewability.com

lifematters.reviewability.com

57 ms

lifematters.reviewability.com

lifematters.reviewability.com

88 ms

login

login

69 ms

locationSetup.css

locationSetup.css

35 ms

color-scheme.css

color-scheme.css

38 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

38 ms

getfivestars.css

getfivestars.css

44 ms

flexbox.css

flexbox.css

43 ms

getfivestars.css

getfivestars.css

43 ms

datepicker.css

datepicker.css

46 ms

jquery.fileupload-ui.css

jquery.fileupload-ui.css

46 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

jquery.qtip.min.css

45 ms

whitelabel.css

whitelabel.css

44 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

46 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

32 ms

jquery.qtip.min.js

jquery.qtip.min.js

70 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

71 ms

bootstrap-transition.js

bootstrap-transition.js

40 ms

bootstrap-modal.js

bootstrap-modal.js

72 ms

bootstrap-dropdown.js

bootstrap-dropdown.js

91 ms

bootstrap-scrollspy.js

bootstrap-scrollspy.js

87 ms

bootstrap-tab.js

bootstrap-tab.js

144 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.js

bootstrap-tooltip.js

87 ms

bootstrap-popover.js

bootstrap-popover.js

88 ms

bootstrap-alert.js

bootstrap-alert.js

87 ms

bootstrap-button.js

bootstrap-button.js

143 ms

bootstrap-collapse.js

bootstrap-collapse.js

142 ms

bootstrap-carousel.js

bootstrap-carousel.js

141 ms

bootstrap-typeahead.js

bootstrap-typeahead.js

141 ms

mobile.min.js

mobile.min.js

71 ms

spin.min.js

spin.min.js

71 ms

e2w.get5.min.js

e2w.get5.min.js

71 ms

jquery.toggleformtext.min.js

jquery.toggleformtext.min.js

71 ms

jquery.flexbox.min.js

jquery.flexbox.min.js

79 ms

touchHandler.min.js

touchHandler.min.js

78 ms

gfsGlobals.js

gfsGlobals.js

79 ms

new-menu.js

new-menu.js

79 ms

index.umd.js

index.umd.js

79 ms

locationSetup.js

locationSetup.js

78 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

83 ms

find.min.js

find.min.js

83 ms

login.min.js

login.min.js

152 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

78 ms

pendo.js

pendo.js

51 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

128 ms

loginlogo-lifematters.reviewability.com

loginlogo-lifematters.reviewability.com

108 ms

step1-formBG-header-woText.png

step1-formBG-header-woText.png

21 ms

blueButton.png

blueButton.png

20 ms

Accessibility Review

lifematters.reviewability.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifematters.reviewability.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lifematters.reviewability.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifematters.reviewability.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifematters.reviewability.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifematters.reviewability.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifematters Reviewability. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: