1.5 sec in total
29 ms
1.2 sec
262 ms
Visit luckycycle.readme.io now to see the best up-to-date Luckycycle Readme content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about luckycycle.readme.io
Integration of the Luckycycle® API is much easier with a bird's eye view of its internal functioning.
Visit luckycycle.readme.ioWe analyzed Luckycycle.readme.io page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
luckycycle.readme.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.5 s
0/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value2,020 ms
7/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.3 s
3/100
10%
29 ms
179 ms
153 ms
373 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Luckycycle.readme.io, 93% (79 requests) were made to Cdn.readme.io and 1% (1 request) were made to Files.readme.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (373 ms) belongs to the original domain Luckycycle.readme.io.
Page size can be reduced by 127.6 kB (76%)
167.6 kB
40.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Luckycycle.readme.io main page is 167.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 147.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Luckycycle Readme needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (96%)
79
3
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luckycycle Readme. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 62 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
luckycycle.readme.io
29 ms
luckycycle.readme.io
179 ms
reference
153 ms
how-it-works
373 ms
force-firefox-anchor-jump.js
66 ms
cash-dom.min.js
90 ms
ui-styles.73fc5c4ee4a56cdd5b4f.css
112 ms
main.aca7568da969c21d26b6.css
143 ms
4508.40dd699b80a24153754f.css
88 ms
routes-SuperHub.fb84ca967880b763dd7b.css
98 ms
Header.7673c830d4259c39e0b5.css
95 ms
routes-Landing.c5ea43d2f4b3b926ff1f.css
106 ms
routes-Doc.921b58c17b447c4e783e.css
107 ms
routes-Reference.8f0c07546cc03a7f4242.css
158 ms
routes-PageNotFound.d8afd1171cf7a455eed7.css
157 ms
CustomPage.38a39d6ce8b0e2afad5a.css
160 ms
Editor.c55904521189f643e443.css
160 ms
routes-Discuss.030a6503a108b6c19d2c.css
162 ms
Page.4def58f587701c828506.css
163 ms
routes-Changelog.322e76a9906b7996894b.css
163 ms
routes-Tutorials.3c7faf70246fa3e69250.css
168 ms
List.e4c5486170ec1404582c.css
165 ms
email-decode.min.js
5 ms
main.804a844f6367d95958c8.js
305 ms
6430.340c0bbf3505b61a983b.js
164 ms
3213.7c9fa45b446d6f29699d.js
206 ms
9230.24a37ba7720deb9ed7e1.js
207 ms
1114.373d6e303e4f11fb7c07.js
206 ms
3280.7c756912886d5c5bcb17.js
231 ms
5098.a786500220b404e6b130.js
209 ms
1284.09fc1b0460034ecebf6b.js
208 ms
9970.161971a23b201c244127.js
213 ms
4508.1430cd7b422e05b60021.js
208 ms
6112.d278c18e4ed97f65dc7e.js
210 ms
5666.c6867e9874b723539603.js
228 ms
routes-SuperHub.e60613dc5d2b663fff8c.js
221 ms
102.f4ad297e50a5af552301.js
227 ms
Header.a23e953875683887db22.js
240 ms
6943.c2319be1f02996004cd9.js
300 ms
routes-Landing.52e34cb60325924c7cc1.js
301 ms
Footer.3a9bf397007111da2e7c.js
301 ms
core-icons-chevron-up-down-svg.bd19e4b1060f5efc7468.js
242 ms
951.b4289c2de5055253850e.js
222 ms
7452.3bb932d836aa61860c59.js
221 ms
361.3cded51b73c026758041.js
214 ms
7496.d0b055c1a79fd6101274.js
212 ms
routes-Doc.1ed85b7a2dab0847aa1f.js
206 ms
8518.c0fdbd25d83a2705e9bd.js
207 ms
2420.807d2cabd59b54efde33.js
188 ms
392.8e45a9e2a17186f74ee7.js
156 ms
9331.66a950396106971b3c46.js
155 ms
6928.f054175ea92c59e723d4.js
155 ms
6458.4721585dc2c960a068a9.js
154 ms
9077.5702f268785ebcb51e83.js
164 ms
5134.b41ea39b07dc0859bba1.js
164 ms
routes-Reference.76052444be69294c7b3e.js
162 ms
core-icons-more-vertical-svg.eff6fea75ff54b9fc124.js
160 ms
routes-PageNotFound.5e7eee7c1d102ad6c0a7.js
162 ms
RDxhiAqUQiemHSe1CQ4N_temp.png
132 ms
9542.0243bbdf1c9caf605762.js
124 ms
CustomPage.d63a1a4d60b21c262960.js
123 ms
1953.5f0c0fd10188f4da3a6f.js
126 ms
Editor.780e1b5ad73875f5b7c5.js
129 ms
core-icons-x-circle-svg.6f66376b18e744088980.js
124 ms
core-icons-suggested-edits-svg.ee13828560765bd0b076.js
125 ms
core-icons-lock-svg.5b5807bd06321ca954f5.js
130 ms
core-icons-arrow-right-svg.73dccae659c1a4b0b68c.js
129 ms
core-icons-chevron-down-svg.7c62462449d8607af6d5.js
135 ms
routes-Discuss.16cf19627ec2e2187113.js
138 ms
9708.65321bf5cdf416e9dd07.js
129 ms
108.34824216347a00772793.js
125 ms
Page.a2a3026b586422903584.js
125 ms
routes-Changelog.65dbc68a4428648402dc.js
119 ms
7055.079bf33cd111a023531f.js
129 ms
Post.ed64950dc1731cbdaee8.js
67 ms
routes-Tutorials.d33b90dab757c3f11b83.js
78 ms
core-icons-arrow-up-right-svg.bc047de76a071b0808ef.js
89 ms
5732.9f7f76d9e3baf7a2c84e.js
65 ms
List.d5cc88aab378cff925b3.js
73 ms
core-icons-trending-up-svg.ff491844e763d50f99ff.js
80 ms
core-icons-callout-info-svg.a97c1bfd46330ce929df.js
80 ms
core-icons-message-circle-svg.28e73d5c7f5f795045ff.js
80 ms
core-icons-star-svg.5ed244cac166abe9ce18.js
85 ms
13d8dde474942669736ac81985cd072d.ttf
94 ms
f691f37e57f04c152e2315ab7dbad881.woff
99 ms
luckycycle.readme.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
luckycycle.readme.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
luckycycle.readme.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luckycycle.readme.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luckycycle.readme.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
luckycycle.readme.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Luckycycle Readme. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: