1.8 sec in total
332 ms
1.3 sec
130 ms
Visit onlineoffice.results.net now to see the best up-to-date Onlineoffice Results content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about onlineoffice.results.net
If you're looking to buy or sell your home in Minnesota or Wisconsin, there is no better real estate team to turn to than RE/MAX Results
Visit onlineoffice.results.netWe analyzed Onlineoffice.results.net page load time and found that the first response time was 332 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
onlineoffice.results.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value23.5 s
0/100
25%
Value23.4 s
0/100
10%
Value1,130 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.148
76/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
332 ms
95 ms
17 ms
44 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Onlineoffice.results.net, 9% (9 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (332 ms) relates to the external source Results.net.
Page size can be reduced by 702.0 kB (63%)
1.1 MB
413.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Onlineoffice.results.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 475.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 653 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onlineoffice Results images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 223.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.9 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 317.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onlineoffice.results.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 317.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (89%)
66
7
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onlineoffice Results. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wp-signup.php
332 ms
gtm.js
95 ms
simple-payments.css
17 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
css
106 ms
FrontEnd.min.css
55 ms
css
105 ms
tribus-idx-crm-front-end-styles.min.css
79 ms
font-awesome.min.css
41 ms
css
104 ms
css
104 ms
css
105 ms
css
104 ms
css
120 ms
css
120 ms
jetpack.css
90 ms
jquery.js
89 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
89 ms
scripts.min.js
97 ms
js
144 ms
FrontEnd.min.js
115 ms
element.js
101 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
102 ms
admin-bar.min.js
101 ms
core.min.js
109 ms
datepicker.min.js
114 ms
widget.min.js
109 ms
position.min.js
113 ms
tooltip.min.js
115 ms
menu.min.js
179 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
179 ms
autocomplete.min.js
179 ms
tribus-idx-crm-front-end-scripts.min.js
139 ms
tridx-not-ie-styles.css
178 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
106 ms
wp-embed.min.js
177 ms
analytics.js
97 ms
quant.js
97 ms
translateelement.css
28 ms
main.js
55 ms
rules-p--kj2b897kdHh8.js
45 ms
collect
33 ms
collect
108 ms
element_main.js
7 ms
pixel;r=1315327666;rf=0;a=p--kj2b897kdHh8;url=https%3A%2F%2Fresults.net%2Fwp-signup.php%3Fnew%3Donlineoffice;fpan=1;fpa=P0-488415329-1504684846831;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;ref=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1504684846831;tzo=-180;ogl=type.website%2Ctitle.RE%2FMAX%20Results%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Fresults%252Enet%2F%2Csite_name.RE%2FMAX%20Results%2Cimage.https%3A%2F%2Fs0%252Ewp%252Ecom%2Fi%2Fblank%252Ejpg%2Clocale.en_US
105 ms
1BD48677870E8D905.css
27 ms
la.min.js
83 ms
Stacked_primary_small-1.png
20 ms
equal-housing.png
55 ms
tribus-bug.png
20 ms
limerick_serial-light-webfont.woff
57 ms
limerick_serial-xlight-webfont.woff
45 ms
limerick_serial-regular-webfont.woff
45 ms
limerick_serial-medium-webfont.woff
44 ms
limerick_serial-bold-webfont.woff
56 ms
limerick_serial-xbold-webfont.woff
44 ms
limerick_serial-heavy-webfont.woff
59 ms
R2xlRQH
27 ms
qd+TGu6XJzLwK3qzzXKYeqc+L442CIxHdRkZdbYGaLU7ja73I7tkXbsoSEVVPlx0npf49NDVoVqeB3n9HbGVFAc=
27 ms
R2xlRQH
27 ms
qd+TGu6XJzLwK3qzzXKYeqc+L442CIxHdRkZdbYGaLU7ja73I7tkXbsoSEVVPlx0npf49NDVoVqeB3n9HbGVFAc=
27 ms
j00NWhWp4Hef0dsZUUBw==
26 ms
j00NWhWp4Hef0dsZUUBw==
27 ms
j00NWhWp4Hef0dsZUUBw==
27 ms
R2xlRQH
26 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
64 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
71 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
63 ms
pd.js
288 ms
roundtrip.js
15 ms
sendgrid.min.js
67 ms
P6DKYR23YVCQTOPCRI6C6E.js
124 ms
fbevents.js
36 ms
out
13 ms
out
13 ms
out
19 ms
out
19 ms
out
19 ms
out
19 ms
out
18 ms
out
18 ms
adsct
123 ms
pixel
78 ms
249778232208423
50 ms
sd
25 ms
translate_24dp.png
61 ms
l
41 ms
377928.gif
28 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
50 ms
pixel
30 ms
27 ms
translate_24dp.png
40 ms
analytics
143 ms
in
16 ms
sync
37 ms
onlineoffice.results.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
onlineoffice.results.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
onlineoffice.results.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onlineoffice.results.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onlineoffice.results.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onlineoffice.results.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onlineoffice Results. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: