Tools & Wizards About Us
r-o-c-k.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

r-o-c-k.org

ROCK - NAR Section 622 | ROCK

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

180 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

413 ms

r-o-c-k.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing ROCK content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about r-o-c-k.org

Rocketry of Orlando's Community Kids.

Visit r-o-c-k.org

Key Findings

We analyzed R-o-c-k.org page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

r-o-c-k.org performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.163

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

r-o-c-k.org

180 ms

r-o-c-k.org

247 ms

www.r-o-c-k.org

342 ms

182 ms

css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original R-o-c-k.org, 19% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain R-o-c-k.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.4 kB (2%)

Content Size

5.5 MB

After Optimization

5.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of R-o-c-k.org main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 104.4 kB

  • Original 5.5 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ROCK images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 727 B

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. R-o-c-k.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 727 B or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (40%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ROCK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

r-o-c-k.org

r-o-c-k.org

180 ms

r-o-c-k.org

r-o-c-k.org

247 ms

www.r-o-c-k.org

www.r-o-c-k.org

342 ms

182 ms

css

css

52 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

65 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

123 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

91 ms

bootstrap-table.min.css

bootstrap-table.min.css

50 ms

default.css

default.css

109 ms

icon

icon

74 ms

quill.snow.css

quill.snow.css

49 ms

rocklogo.gif

rocklogo.gif

115 ms

hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

228 ms

20101204-ROCK%20586.JPG

20101204-ROCK%20586.JPG

1709 ms

traffic_light_green.png

traffic_light_green.png

146 ms

2007-03-03-11-10-12-001.jpg

2007-03-03-11-10-12-001.jpg

606 ms

external.png

external.png

161 ms

MCoTzAn-1s3IGyJMVacY2g.ttf

MCoTzAn-1s3IGyJMVacY2g.ttf

23 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

18 ms

Accessibility Review

r-o-c-k.org accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

r-o-c-k.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

r-o-c-k.org SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R-o-c-k.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that R-o-c-k.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

r-o-c-k.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ROCK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: