1.2 sec in total
125 ms
781 ms
287 ms
Visit r-studio.com now to see the best up-to-date R Studio content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about r-studio.com
R-TT offers disk recovery software and hard drive data recovery tools. Network and RAID support.
Visit r-studio.comWe analyzed R-studio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
r-studio.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value3,250 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
125 ms
151 ms
62 ms
61 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original R-studio.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (219 ms) belongs to the original domain R-studio.com.
Page size can be reduced by 430.5 kB (65%)
658.8 kB
228.3 kB
In fact, the total size of R-studio.com main page is 658.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 275.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 459 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R Studio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 135.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 228.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. R-studio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 228.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (66%)
77
26
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
r-studio.com
125 ms
www.r-studio.com
151 ms
style.css
62 ms
style.css
61 ms
content_.png
32 ms
header-b.png
33 ms
header_b.jpg
72 ms
logo0000.png
66 ms
solutions-std-left.png
69 ms
solutions-std-back.png
70 ms
solutions-std-border.png
68 ms
solutions-std-right.png
70 ms
search-l.png
94 ms
search-b.png
101 ms
search-c.png
102 ms
btn_twitter.png
102 ms
btn_facebook.png
94 ms
header-t.png
98 ms
sub-sel-bg.png
121 ms
sub-sel-left.png
123 ms
sub-sel-right.png
124 ms
lang_choose.png
125 ms
lang_en.png
126 ms
lang_de.png
127 ms
lang_fr.png
187 ms
lang_it.png
188 ms
lang_es.png
188 ms
lang_pt.png
190 ms
lang_ja.png
188 ms
lang_ko.png
190 ms
lang_zhcn.png
190 ms
lang_zhhk.png
193 ms
lang_ru.png
193 ms
content-1.png
194 ms
middle-u.gif
195 ms
green-stp.png
196 ms
mark_win13.png
218 ms
ctx-article-top-bg.png
219 ms
ctx-article-bottom-bg.png
215 ms
digilab.png
217 ms
WVxhP68UBTQ
182 ms
cnet_swissknife.png
191 ms
data-medics.png
186 ms
pc_world.png
191 ms
filecluster_5stars.gif
186 ms
fdc.png
181 ms
digital_video_editing.png
182 ms
rstudio_win_main.jpg
211 ms
mark_green_ul.png
186 ms
separato.png
184 ms
mark_local.png
179 ms
mark_network.png
216 ms
mark_do_recover.png
216 ms
btn_buy.png
216 ms
mark_view_eula17.png
215 ms
mark_64kb.png
198 ms
mark_dl20.png
195 ms
mark_service_util.png
196 ms
middle-tp.png
194 ms
side-hea.png
199 ms
blue-sid.png
205 ms
side-box.png
145 ms
btn_download.png
152 ms
side-bot.png
152 ms
buy_online.png
152 ms
fb_5stars.png
181 ms
mark_sysrec.png
181 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
65 ms
www-embed-player.js
84 ms
sysrec-bot.png
179 ms
microsoft_logo.jpg
179 ms
srs_logo.gif
178 ms
footer-t.png
178 ms
bg-shado.png
190 ms
footer-b.png
195 ms
bottom-s.png
175 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
32 ms
ad_status.js
30 ms
tab-sel-.png
31 ms
r-studio.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
r-studio.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
r-studio.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R-studio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that R-studio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
r-studio.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R Studio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: