1.8 sec in total
233 ms
1.3 sec
266 ms
Visit raam.org now to see the best up-to-date Raam content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about raam.org
Generalist in life, specialist in action.
Visit raam.orgWe analyzed Raam.org page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
raam.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.0 s
96/100
10%
233 ms
187 ms
104 ms
170 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Raam.org, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) relates to the external source Secure.gravatar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 433.6 kB (68%)
635.9 kB
202.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Raam.org main page is 635.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 428.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 406 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 277.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 277.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raam.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 141.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (50%)
18
9
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
raam.org
233 ms
raam.org
187 ms
8952492d305608ef40ae9aaaaf82f2ff-compressor-part.css
104 ms
69d430892558a49c57087c36553cc6ca-compressor-part.js
170 ms
938bc3193002bb8da100165bc671c6e3-compressor-part.js
138 ms
s2member-o.php
441 ms
2fb8dee3969a7597d0d892028e01cc2e-compressor-part.js
121 ms
e-201608.js
29 ms
api.js
40 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
57 ms
analytics.js
57 ms
664 ms
wpaudio-play.png
41 ms
collect
24 ms
wpaudio-pause.png
35 ms
soundmanager2-nodebug-jsmin.js
45 ms
checkout.js
162 ms
ajax-loader.gif
39 ms
g.gif
30 ms
recaptcha__en.js
115 ms
raam.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
raam.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
raam.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raam.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raam.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
raam.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Raam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: