Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

racechip.co.uk

Engine performance tuning by the global market leader

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

769 ms

racechip.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to racechip.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Racechip best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about racechip.co.uk

Engine tuning for diesel and fuel engines, specially tailored for your car. Up to 30 percent more HP and Nm. For all makes and models.

Visit racechip.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Racechip.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

racechip.co.uk performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.128

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

racechip.co.uk

230 ms

www.racechip.co.uk

736 ms

varify.js

52 ms

401479ac1fcb2409a4bbc5e45008f63d.r3-72-02.css

25 ms

2ccdf948bda8de02fad22ee040e2781c.r3-72-02.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Racechip.co.uk, 2% (1 request) were made to App.varify.io and 2% (1 request) were made to Static.zdassets.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (867 ms) relates to the external source Gtm.racechip.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 178.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Racechip.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 137.4 kB

  • Original 172.7 kB
  • After minification 144.6 kB
  • After compression 35.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Racechip images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 565.1 kB
  • After minification 565.1 kB
  • After compression 562.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

  • Original 139.1 kB
  • After minification 139.1 kB
  • After compression 119.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Racechip.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (28%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Racechip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

racechip.co.uk accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

racechip.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

racechip.co.uk SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Racechip.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Racechip.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Racechip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: