3.5 sec in total
837 ms
2.6 sec
105 ms
Click here to check amazing Rachel Nieborg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rachelnieborg.com
Visit rachelnieborg.comWe analyzed Rachelnieborg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 837 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rachelnieborg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value390 ms
68/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
837 ms
85 ms
71 ms
24 ms
120 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Rachelnieborg.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (837 ms) belongs to the original domain Rachelnieborg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 874.9 kB (52%)
1.7 MB
793.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Rachelnieborg.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 790.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rachel Nieborg needs image optimization as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 625.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 625.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rachelnieborg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (75%)
59
15
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rachel Nieborg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rachelnieborg.com
837 ms
widgets.js
85 ms
plusone.js
71 ms
pinit.js
24 ms
wonderpluginsliderengine.css
120 ms
style.css
186 ms
style-mobile.css
191 ms
css
35 ms
css
46 ms
organic-shortcodes.css
188 ms
font-awesome.css
181 ms
public.css
189 ms
jquery.js
275 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
273 ms
compat.min.js
296 ms
wonderpluginsliderskins.js
295 ms
wonderpluginslider.js
455 ms
hoverIntent.js
273 ms
superfish.js
363 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
364 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
365 ms
jquery.modal.min.js
367 ms
functional.css
365 ms
style-light.css
488 ms
masonry.min.js
484 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
484 ms
jquery.custom.js
485 ms
navigation.js
494 ms
comment-reply.min.js
543 ms
core.min.js
551 ms
widget.min.js
555 ms
accordion.min.js
547 ms
mouse.min.js
556 ms
resizable.min.js
549 ms
draggable.min.js
633 ms
button.min.js
636 ms
position.min.js
640 ms
dialog.min.js
643 ms
jquery.shortcodes.js
639 ms
tabs.min.js
641 ms
tabs.js
723 ms
wp-embed.min.js
723 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
17 ms
pinit_main.js
30 ms
all.frontend.min.js
623 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
611 ms
cropped-cropped-birdgrijsPHOTOGRAPHER-kl2-.jpg
321 ms
Horace.jpg
405 ms
Slide-Y.jpg
624 ms
Slide-Lost-Balloon.jpg
626 ms
Slide-Blossom-Blooming.jpg
805 ms
Slide-The-Winds-Whisper.jpg
718 ms
Slide-Lac-LActus.jpg
633 ms
Slide-%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6.jpg
534 ms
loading-icon-128x128.gif
610 ms
light-arrows.png
692 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
9 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nmFp2sMiApZm5Dx7NpSTOZk.woff
15 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nnl4twXkwp3_u9ZoePkT564.woff
17 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngi3Hume1-TKjJz2lX0jYjo.woff
17 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
17 ms
-g5pDUSRgvxvOl5u-a_WHw.woff
18 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
17 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
774 ms
all.js
134 ms
144 ms
xd_arbiter.php
74 ms
xd_arbiter.php
130 ms
ping
57 ms
rachelnieborg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rachelnieborg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rachelnieborg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rachelnieborg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rachelnieborg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rachelnieborg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rachel Nieborg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: