3.3 sec in total
896 ms
2.2 sec
117 ms
Click here to check amazing Rachelriley content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rachelriley.org
Visit rachelriley.orgWe analyzed Rachelriley.org page load time and found that the first response time was 896 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rachelriley.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.128
82/100
15%
Value4.9 s
78/100
10%
896 ms
6 ms
165 ms
166 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Rachelriley.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (896 ms) belongs to the original domain Rachelriley.org.
Page size can be reduced by 30.4 kB (28%)
110.6 kB
80.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rachelriley.org main page is 110.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 58.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rachelriley images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rachelriley.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (83%)
36
6
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rachelriley. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rachelriley.org
896 ms
jquery.min.js
6 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.min.js
165 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.4.css
166 ms
styleswitcher.js
165 ms
forum_fn.js
166 ms
style.php
253 ms
normal.css
175 ms
rachelriley_logo.png
244 ms
icon_topic_latest.gif
164 ms
cron.php
239 ms
border_left.gif
164 ms
border_right.gif
166 ms
border_top.gif
167 ms
border_top_left.gif
233 ms
border_top_right.gif
303 ms
bg_header.gif
308 ms
corners_left2.png
330 ms
corners_right2.png
333 ms
icon_textbox_search.gif
335 ms
bg_button.gif
399 ms
corners_left.png
465 ms
corners_right.png
473 ms
icon_home.gif
492 ms
icon_fontsize.gif
497 ms
icon_faq.gif
500 ms
icon_register.gif
561 ms
icon_logout.gif
630 ms
bg_list.gif
635 ms
forum_read_locked.gif
660 ms
forum_read.gif
661 ms
border_bottom2.gif
665 ms
border_bottom.gif
726 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
print.css
87 ms
medium.css
85 ms
large.css
166 ms
rachelriley.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rachelriley.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rachelriley.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rachelriley.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rachelriley.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rachelriley.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rachelriley. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: