Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

rachidia.net

Rachidia ???????? - ????? ????? ?????? - PHP MySQL- PostGreSQL - CSS - HTML -Javascript

Page Load Speed

20.4 sec in total

First Response

10.1 sec

Resources Loaded

10.2 sec

Page Rendered

124 ms

rachidia.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rachidia.net homepage info - get ready to check Rachidia best content right away, or after learning these important things about rachidia.net

???????? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ???? - ??????? ???????????-????????-??????? ?????? - ????? ?????? ???? ????? ???????? - ??? ????? ????? ?? ??? ?????...

Visit rachidia.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rachidia.net page load time and found that the first response time was 10.1 sec and then it took 10.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rachidia.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rachidia.net

10089 ms

style.css

32 ms

alogo.gif

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rachidia.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rachidia.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.7 kB (72%)

Content Size

7.9 kB

After Optimization

2.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Rachidia.net main page is 7.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 5.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rachidia.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rachidia. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rachidia.net accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

rachidia.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rachidia.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    AR

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1256

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rachidia.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Arabic. Our system also found out that Rachidia.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1256. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rachidia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: