Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

rackdoctor.net

Rack and Pinion - rack and pinion steering - rack and pinion remanufacturing - rack and pinion manufacturers - Rack Doctor

Page Load Speed

848 ms in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

599 ms

Page Rendered

216 ms

rackdoctor.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rack Doctor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rackdoctor.net

Rack and Pinion - rack and pinion steering - rack and pinion remanufacturing - rack and pinion manufacturers - Rack Doctor

Visit rackdoctor.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rackdoctor.net page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 815 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rackdoctor.net performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rackdoctor.net

33 ms

imageSwap.js

6 ms

layout1.css

10 ms

theme.css

28 ms

color_3.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Rackdoctor.net, 59% (10 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Seal-myrtlebeach.bbb.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (485 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 137.5 kB (50%)

Content Size

275.4 kB

After Optimization

137.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Rackdoctor.net main page is 275.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 109.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 46.8 kB

  • Original 54.4 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 107.2 kB
  • After minification 107.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rack Doctor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 87.6 kB

  • Original 109.0 kB
  • After minification 108.9 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rackdoctor.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (19%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rack Doctor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rackdoctor.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rackdoctor.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

SEO Factors

rackdoctor.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rackdoctor.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rackdoctor.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rack Doctor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: