Tools & Wizards About Us
racks.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

racks.co.in

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

844 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

249 ms

racks.co.in screenshot

About Website

Visit racks.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Racks content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about racks.co.in

Manufacturers and Suppliers of Garment Racks, Stands, Counters, Revolving Stand, Appeals Slat Wall Systems, Mumbai, India

Visit racks.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Racks.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 844 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

racks.co.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

racks.co.in

844 ms

bootstrap.css

527 ms

style.css

1191 ms

jquery.min.js

1679 ms

move-top.js

1596 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Racks.co.in, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Racks.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 359.9 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Racks.co.in main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 17.0 kB
  • After minification 14.5 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Racks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 169.8 kB

  • Original 246.9 kB
  • After minification 225.2 kB
  • After compression 77.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 169.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 175.4 kB

  • Original 203.9 kB
  • After minification 157.5 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Racks.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 175.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (35%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Racks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

racks.co.in

racks.co.in

844 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

527 ms

style.css

style.css

1191 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1679 ms

move-top.js

move-top.js

1596 ms

easing.js

easing.js

1576 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1858 ms

demo.css

demo.css

785 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

1352 ms

classie.js

classie.js

1471 ms

uisearch.js

uisearch.js

1651 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

1731 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

1850 ms

css

css

14 ms

bgnoise_lg.png

bgnoise_lg.png

261 ms

logo.png

logo.png

543 ms

wire-hook-removable-type.jpg

wire-hook-removable-type.jpg

818 ms

Garment-Hanging-Bracket-Wall-Mounted-type-1.jpg

Garment-Hanging-Bracket-Wall-Mounted-type-1.jpg

860 ms

swing-system.jpg

swing-system.jpg

581 ms

aboutus.jpg

aboutus.jpg

802 ms

Table-Top-Revolving-Stand.jpg

Table-Top-Revolving-Stand.jpg

798 ms

Garment-Hanging-Bracket-Wall-Mounted-type.jpg

Garment-Hanging-Bracket-Wall-Mounted-type.jpg

1072 ms

e-mail1.jpg

e-mail1.jpg

862 ms

nav_arrow.png

nav_arrow.png

1045 ms

bnr-1.jpg

bnr-1.jpg

2135 ms

bnr-3.jpg

bnr-3.jpg

2451 ms

bnr-2.jpg

bnr-2.jpg

2533 ms

bnr-4.jpg

bnr-4.jpg

2486 ms

Play-Regular.ttf

Play-Regular.ttf

1584 ms

arw.png

arw.png

1310 ms

s-arw.png

s-arw.png

1677 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

1869 ms

top-arrow.png

top-arrow.png

1925 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

277 ms

SEO Factors

racks.co.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Racks.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Racks.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

racks.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Racks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: