Tools & Wizards About Us
radfordtransit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

radfordtransit.com

Passio GO!

Page Load Speed

537 ms in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

384 ms

Page Rendered

60 ms

radfordtransit.com screenshot

About Website

Visit radfordtransit.com now to see the best up-to-date Radfordtransit content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about radfordtransit.com

Passio Transit Systems

Visit radfordtransit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Radfordtransit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 444 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radfordtransit.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,440 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.944

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radfordtransit.com

93 ms

radford.passiogo.com

91 ms

go_messages_style.css

11 ms

normalize.css

11 ms

jquery-ui.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Radfordtransit.com, 78% (38 requests) were made to Radford.passiogo.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (163 ms) relates to the external source Cdnjs.cloudflare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 184.7 kB (36%)

Content Size

515.5 kB

After Optimization

330.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Radfordtransit.com main page is 515.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 406.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

  • Original 27.0 kB
  • After minification 18.3 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 49.2 kB
  • After minification 39.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Radfordtransit needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 149.1 kB

  • Original 406.2 kB
  • After minification 406.2 kB
  • After compression 257.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.1 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 33.0 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 28.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radfordtransit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (65%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radfordtransit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

radfordtransit.com

radfordtransit.com

93 ms

radford.passiogo.com

radford.passiogo.com

91 ms

go_messages_style.css

go_messages_style.css

11 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

11 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

27 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

81 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.css

jquery.timepicker.min.css

29 ms

pushy.css

pushy.css

29 ms

hamburgers.css

hamburgers.css

46 ms

fontawesome_all.min.css

fontawesome_all.min.css

46 ms

jsgrid-theme.min.css

jsgrid-theme.min.css

77 ms

jsgrid.min.css

jsgrid.min.css

94 ms

index.css

index.css

47 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

58 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

52 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

50 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.js

jquery.timepicker.min.js

51 ms

jsgrid.min.js

jsgrid.min.js

163 ms

jquery.noty.js

jquery.noty.js

52 ms

livedisplay_jquery.cookie.js

livedisplay_jquery.cookie.js

51 ms

modernizr-custom-flex.js

modernizr-custom-flex.js

52 ms

textFit.min.js

textFit.min.js

54 ms

jquery.xcolor.min.js

jquery.xcolor.min.js

54 ms

firebase-app.js

firebase-app.js

57 ms

firebase-messaging.js

firebase-messaging.js

62 ms

go_helpers.js

go_helpers.js

52 ms

map_functions.js

map_functions.js

52 ms

drawNavigationPath.js

drawNavigationPath.js

53 ms

ws.js

ws.js

54 ms

index.js

index.js

63 ms

js

js

122 ms

markerclusterer.js

markerclusterer.js

55 ms

pushy.js

pushy.js

52 ms

js

js

85 ms

ic_bus_2019_white.png

ic_bus_2019_white.png

58 ms

circle_big_w_arrow_white.png

circle_big_w_arrow_white.png

25 ms

ic_messages.svg

ic_messages.svg

26 ms

ico_2021.png

ico_2021.png

28 ms

ic_map.svg

ic_map.svg

27 ms

ic_buses_modern.svg

ic_buses_modern.svg

29 ms

ic_routes_manage.svg

ic_routes_manage.svg

28 ms

arrow.svg

arrow.svg

29 ms

ic_user.png

ic_user.png

30 ms

ic_send.svg

ic_send.svg

34 ms

ic_format_list.svg

ic_format_list.svg

30 ms

google-play-badge.png

google-play-badge.png

32 ms

appstore-badge.svg

appstore-badge.svg

32 ms

shuttle_rr0.png

shuttle_rr0.png

33 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

28 ms

Accessibility Review

radfordtransit.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

radfordtransit.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

radfordtransit.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radfordtransit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radfordtransit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

radfordtransit.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radfordtransit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: